User talk:Sanders11

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Christian Shepherd[edit]

I posted on the Discussion page. Not sure how to proceed. The fact is, that while the show creators were absolute in Locke being restored, they are being cryptical about Christian, IMHO on purpose because we are not really SUPPOSED to know, and as such, I realize I am going to have a hard time getting something direct that shows Christian to be truely alive.

But I got to laugh at the following statement you made on the discussion page as well though...."Well if he is discovered to be alive on the Island in season 5, then it should be added at that point. Sanders11 (talk) 12:22, 25 November 2008 (UTC)"

At what point would we be able to say he is alive again without them saying it? If he makes some sort of appearance that is seen by more then just Jack, Locke, and Claire (all three of whom could be something else). I imagine if something were to happen where more people are with Christian Shepherd and know he is there, then we will have final confirmation. Whippletheduck (talk) 04:24, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Ana Lucia[edit]

Hey, nice job with the article. It looks really nice, and it's a real improvement from what it originally was. Actually, I think I might review the article. :-) / 10:13, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

GA Shannon.[edit]

Hi, I noticed you posted that Shannon Rutherford's article is up for GA nomination. I have never worked on promoting an article to any type of "status", but I have joined the Lost article for many reasons, and one is to help promote the articles here on Wikipedia. If there's anything I can do to help you or anyone else, please let my know and I'll help immediately. Thank you. --HELLØ ŦHERE 21:12, 9 December 2008 (UTC)


You're welcome, and well done with the character articles, they're looking really good. By the way, I have been working on Danielle Rousseau, and it is almost GA status. Unfortunately, I have hit a stump and cannot find more info for the "development" and "reception" sections. I was hoping for a bit of info about why she was created, what the writers intended to do with the character; early things about development. Also, the reception section is only about her death, and even those reviews do not provide much. I was hoping for stuff about her early appearances, but alas I could not find any. Could you give the article a go, or are you trying to focus on the main characters? / 00:50, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

Nice work on the article. The interview would have been great, but I don't think it can really be used (copyright issues). The article is at a good length now, do you thinks it's ready for a GA nom? / 06:20, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
Hey, nice work! The development and reception sections have really been bulked up. I think it's fine now. :) I removed a couple of reviews (mainly ones I added from the "MKJ" article) because they didn't really add to the character's reception. They were just like, "I liked Rousseau, shame she died". They were just filler, so I kept the good ones. Personality sections are a waste of time, IMO, and border on POV. I don't think they're necessary. Do you know which podcast that one is? A number would be great. / 09:08, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
I found the podcast! :) / 11:07, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

I nominated the article; thanks for all your help. :) I'm pretty sure the age thing is not true, but I'll keep on checking for sources. I haven't been able to find a better source for the casting of Young Rousseau, but I'm hoping one turns up by the time the article is reviewed. / 13:36, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

Oh yes, I can't believe I forgot, Merry Christmas to you too! And the arc section is at a good length, but you can trim it if you like. / 13:44, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

I just realized that the ref I included didn't include the quote. I assumed the ref had a link to the podcast, my bad! :S I found the Lostpedia transcript for the podcast, here. What do you think about adding it? Sure, it's not considered to be a reliable source, but I think an uncontroversial thing like this is alright. / 05:36, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Passed! Good luck on Tom (Lost), and I might start working on another character soon, probably either Juliet, Sun or Claire. / 03:53, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

Just saw Michael Dawson (Lost), and nice job! I really should start working on another character; can't let you hog all the fun. ;) 15:06, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks; the Friends article took me a while to finish, but now that it's done I'm happy with the result. I'll probably start working on Alex (Lost) next; as you mentioned dead/recurring characters are a lot easier than alive/main characters because there's much less to write. Also, you don't have to update their arc summaries every few episodes. Maybe we could focus on getting all the recurring characters to GA? Rose Henderson is practically a GA already, and we could probably use some of her info for Bernard Nadler. 02:00, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
While it's a good idea, I think the merge would make the arc section a bit too hard to write. Unlike N&P, Rose and Bernard were seperated for most of the show. I say we keep them seperate for now, and only merge them if there is absolutely nothing out there on Bernard, which I doubt. Also, when are you going to nom Rose? I think the article is ready. :) 04:52, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
Yeah, Rose's surname is a bit ambiguous. If you have that particular magazine, you can use Template:Cite journal to cite it, but I think an online ref would be better for this instance. Since I live in Australia (where the episodes air a while later), I want to avoid spoilers, meaning I will not edit Lost articles as prominently anymore (though I may keep working on the character articles). 01:40, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Something you deserve[edit]

Original Barnstar.png The Original Barnstar
For the hard work you've put into giving the characters of Lost decent articles. I'm sure they appreciate it! :) —97198 (talk) 06:52, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
Hey, no fair; I wanted to give you one first! :( Anyways, it is indeed well deserved, and expect another one once you get a couple more character GAs. :D 00:51, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Michael Dawson (Lost)[edit]

The article Michael Dawson (Lost) you nominated as a good article has passed Symbol support vote.svg. Well done! TheLeftorium 15:59, 12 February 2009 (UTC)


Lostbarnstar.png The Lost Barnstar
After I noticed your fantastic work on the Michael Dawson article, I took a look at your other contribs, it's amazing. I hope a Lost character topic will soon be made, and I expect you will soon receive more of these. Keep up the good work!--Music26/11 15:11, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
By the way, the Mr. Eko article is a GA, so you can strike that of the list.--Music26/11 15:45, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
Gee, thank you very much. If you need any help, you can always contact me.--Music26/11 16:54, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed on your to-do list you wanted to create a Charles Widmore article. Someone else apparently did, I helped out a bit, but the article needs work, and I'm not the right person to do that; maybe you are? Just notifying you.--Music26/11 21:00, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

Charlotte Lewis (Lost)[edit]

Hey, I've reviewed your GAN for Charlotte Lewis (Lost). Nice job, I doubt my suggestions will take long to address. I hope to bring this kind of quality to the South Park character articles some time, after we get through the featured topic drive. Let me know when you've gotten to the suggestions and I'm sure it'll be a pass very soon! — Hunter Kahn (contribs) 17:25, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

Rose and Bernard Nadler on hold[edit]

Hello, I have reviewed Rose and Bernard Nadler for GA and have placed the article on hold. Notes on what needs to be done can be found at the article's talk page. Good luck. -- Matthew RD 17:58, 6 March 2011 (UTC)


I have put some questions on the GA page, also, I am on vacation and soon, I will be in a place with no wi-fi so if possible, when I am leaving the place with wi-fi, please get it on hold until 3 days after finished. ~~EBE123~~ talkContribs 23:50, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

More. ~~EBE123~~ talkContribs 22:59, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
Closed. ~~EBE123~~ talkContribs 15:19, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
More ~~EBE123~~ talkContribs 13:37, 3 July 2011 (UTC)


Hey, thanks for the review again. I've left you a comment at the GAR talk as I've done all but two of your points. :)RaintheOne BAM 21:41, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

And I fixed those too.RaintheOne BAM 23:58, 29 June 2011 (UTC)


I have addressed your concerns at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of songs recorded by Rihanna/archive1. With regard to your comment about not being familiar with the process, if you feel I have met your concerns and addressed them, and feel the overall quality of the article is to a good standard, then a decision on a Support or Oppose would be appreciated. Aaron You Da One 22:30, 9 March 2012 (UTC)


Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Sanders11. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of songs recorded by Leona Lewis/archive1.
Message added 12:53, 25 April 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I have addressed all of your points now. Thanks. Aaron You Da One 12:53, 25 April 2012 (UTC)


Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Sanders11. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of songs recorded by Leona Lewis/archive2.
Message added 13:03, 27 July 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Aaron You Da One 13:03, 27 July 2012 (UTC)


Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Sanders11. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of songs recorded by Leona Lewis/archive2.
Message added 11:47, 2 August 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Aaron You Da One 11:47, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

Leona Lewis discography[edit]

I can't nominate for DYK then.  — AARONTALK 17:17, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

Seems a bit of a cheat way to get a DYK? Sanders11 (talk) 21:16, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
How is it a cheat way? It's a shit lead and is a god way for attention to be bought to the article.  — AARONTALK 22:39, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
It just seems like the equivalent making a GA worse so it gets delisted then modifying it so you can renominate it as your own. DYK is there to highlight new articles created and expansion of stubs rather than deliberately shortening an article just so you can claim you expanded it five times. Why not just expand actual stubs and new articles? Sanders11 (talk) 18:26, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
No it's not, that's completely different. The lead needs to be rewritten anyway, I don't see the problem with removing it and the rewriting it so it can qualify for DYK to raise awareness of it on the main page.  — AARONTALK 19:16, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 12[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of Lost cast members (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to James Ford, Michael Bowen, Sheila Kelley and John Hawkes

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:33, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Operation Lost[edit]

Hey, I saw you're interested in Lost articles. I'm currently working on a new project codenamed Operation Lost dedicated to all Lost articles. Interested in helping? -Newyorkadam (talk) 01:00, 17 March 2014 (UTC)Newyorkadam

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)