User talk:Sanova23

January 2014

Hello, I'm Jeh. An edit that you recently made to Leverage (TV series) seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Jeh (talk) 05:05, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm I dream of horses. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Christian Kane, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 05:06, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Aldis Hodge. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Jeh (talk) 05:14, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Willow Shields. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators can block users from editing if they repeatedly vandalize. Fraggle81 (talk) 05:14, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Sam Claflin. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Jeh (talk) 05:16, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at The Hunger Games: Mockingjay – Part 1, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: The Hunger Games: Mockingjay – Part 1 was changed by Sanova23 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.856264 on 2014-01-15T05:42:43+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 05:42, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 08:01, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]