Jump to content

User talk:Santrampaljimaharaj89

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ghisa Das (October 24)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Idoghor Melody were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 07:27, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Santrampaljimaharaj89! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 07:27, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice

[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 09:52, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Only warning

[edit]

Wikipedia goes by reliable sources, not by your opinion or my opinion. Removing well-sourced negative content of a religious leader, as you did repeatedly at Rampal (Spritual Leader), is a no-no. So is creating articles without reliable sources for the purpose of praising the same religious leader, as you did with this draft. If you disrupt Wikipedia with religious propaganda again, you will be blocked from editing. Bishonen | tålk 15:06, 25 October 2022 (UTC).[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ghisa Das

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Santrampaljimaharaj89. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ghisa Das, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:02, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]