User talk:Sattler613

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Sattler613. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Nick Moyes (talk) 14:23, 28 April 2019 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Sattler613! You created a thread called legal cover if I use any Wikipedia material for my book? at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Dr. Steve Sattler

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, the introduction of inappropriate pages, such as Draft:Dr. Steve Sattler, is considered vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Jdcomix (talk) 13:59, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The reason this is marked as vandalism is the ending section, which goes on a diatribe about narratives in the A-I conflict, which is completely unencyclopedic without reliable sourcing. Jdcomix (talk) 14:00, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]