User talk:Sebbi
Welcome
[edit]Welcome!
Hello, Sebbi, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Karmafist 04:18, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
Paulo Coelho articles
[edit]Hi Sebbi, in response to your idea to collaborate on the articles about Paulo Coelho's books [1] perhaps you'd like to start the article on The Fifth Mountain? I'd love to help you. Please feel welcome to reply at my talk page. Cheers! Lisa 14:36, 11 September 2005 (UTC)
- Your start of The Fifth Mountain looks good to me. Nice. I did some edits, added a few more links, fixed up categories, etc, but I think my memory is really hazy on this book and I struggled to remember the plot specifics. Please check the talk page for the article so we can talk about the plot there. I'm worried my recall of the book isn't too good... Cheers Lisa 07:23, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on The Impressionables requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.
If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. AndrewHowse (talk) 19:19, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
Might you have a look at this?
[edit]I've posted a topic here [[2]] and was wondering what you thought?Smatprt (talk) 04:00, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
Your recent changes on wikipedia theatre's talk page
[edit]I just reverted your recent changes to this page as you deleted not only my comments but the comments of 6 other editors in an on going discussion. That is a big no no and may be viewed as vandalism. If this behavior continues I will pursue reporting you to wikipedia administrators.Broadweighbabe (talk) 00:39, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry to snip at you a moment before. I just realised that you didn't intend to erase those comments. The link above took you to an old version of the page which you in turn edited causing it to act like a reversion when you added your comment. A hint in the future. If you have to go to the top to edit the page than it is an old version of the article.Broadweighbabe (talk) 00:49, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
- No problem. And I made sure I put your comment on the current page if you hadn't noticed.Broadweighbabe (talk) 12:55, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
Your opinion Please
[edit]I would like your opinion at to the debate going on here [[3]] at the WikiProject Theatre. Smatprt (talk) 01:46, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject Theatre Newsletter - February 2010
[edit]| The WikiProject Theatre Newsletter (Febrauary 2010) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference
[edit]Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.
On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.
For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of WP:MINOR, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then this discussion will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.
Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 19:48, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
 | Hello! You are invited to participate in the Theatre Project's Collaboration of the Month. This time it's the Theatre article. In the last 30 days, this article received 52,500 hits, or roughly 2,000 every day. Hope you can help! Nominate an article that could be greatly improved. |  |
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
The article Sequel (software) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (software) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:08, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of Stylianos Atteshlis for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stylianos Atteshlis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stylianos Atteshlis until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- RoySmith (talk) 22:14, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
Wikimedia Sound Logo project
[edit]| Wikimedia Sound Logo project | |
|---|---|
|
Hello, the Wikimedia sound logo project is in an early development phase -- this stage is for asking all kinds of questions, developing and fielding ideas, finding themes and shaping the direction of the project. Here is a link to the meta page for the project: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Communications/Sound_Logo Your input is welcome. Thank you. | |