Jump to content

User talk:Sekharblack123

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, Sekharblack123, and welcome to Wikipedia! While efforts to improve Wikipedia are always welcome, unfortunately your contributions are not written in an English that is good enough to be useful. You appear to be more familiar with Marathi; did you know there is a Wikipedia in Marathi? You may prefer to contribute there instead. In any case, welcome to the project, and thank you for your efforts! If you need help, please feel free to notify me on my talk page. Lemonaka (talk) 08:41, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


सुस्वागतम्!

[edit]

नमस्कार, Sekharblack123, आणि विकिपीडियावर आपले स्वागत आहे.विकिपीडियात आपण करू इच्छित असलेल्या सुधारणांच्या प्रयत्नांचे स्वागत करतानाच,कळवण्यास खेद वाटतो की आपण केलेले लेखन योगदान उपयोगी होऊ शकेल अशा इंग्रजीत नाही असे माझे मत आहे.आपला मराठी भाषेशी अधिक चांगला परिचय असेल असे वाटते,आपणास माहित आहे का की मराठी भाषेत सुद्धा विकिपीडिया उपलब्ध आहे ? आपण कदाचित मराठीभाषी विकिपीडियावर लेखन योगदान करणे अधीक पसंत कराल.मराठी विकिपीडिया आपल्या कडून कोणत्या लेखन योगदानाची विशेषत्वाने विनंती करते आणि इतर अधीक माहिती करिता मराठी विकिपीडियाच्यावतीने येथे उपलब्ध केलेले पान पहा.

किंवा आपण आपले इंग्रजी लेखन स्वतःच्या सदस्य पानावर करून घेऊन ते इथे चढवण्या आधी भाषीक सुयोग्यतेच्या दृष्टीने तपासण्या करिता येथे महाराष्ट्रीय विकिपीडियन्सना अथवा इथे इंग्रजी विकिपीडियावरील भारतीय विकिपीडियनना सुद्धा सहाय्य विनंती करू शकता.आपल्या प्रयत्नांकरिता धन्यवाद ! आणि कोणत्याही स्थितीत , विकिपीडिया प्रकल्पावर आपले स्वागतच आहे, आपणास कोणत्याही सहाय्याची आवश्यकता भासल्यास कृपया माझ्या चर्चा पानावर मोकळेपणाने मांडा, अथवा आपली शंका/सहाय्य विनंती मराठी भाषेत मांडावयाची झाल्यास मराठी विकिपीडिया स्वागत आणि साहाय्य चमू आपल्या शंकांचे/सहाय्य विनंत्यांचे मराठी विकिपीडिया मदत मुख्यालयात स्वागत करते. Lemonaka (talk) 08:41, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

[edit]

Information icon Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Chasa (caste), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Chariotrider555 (talk) 02:00, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sekharblack123, you removed a bunch of verified information and inserted a rather poorly written comment without verification. Drmies (talk) 15:28, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Chariotrider555 (talk) 15:58, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in South Asian social groups. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has enacted a more stringent set of rules. Any administrator may impose sanctions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Chariotrider555 (talk) 15:58, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi frnd. I am from odissa. So i know odissa culture. I just tried to correct the information about odia cast system. In fact Chasa in a higher community. They are actually ksatriyas not Shudra. You can research by Google Chasa khandayat. Sekharblack123 (talk) 17:48, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia articles must not contain original research. Wikipedia articles should be based on reliable, published sources. Readers must be able to check that any of the information within Wikipedia articles is not just made up. This means all material must be attributable to reliable, published sources. Additionally, quotations and any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be supported by inline citations. Chariotrider555 (talk) 20:16, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hlw frnd I am saying the practical situation. Chasa caste have higher value then gudia, gopal, or other vaisya type caste. Hence you should delete that line Shudra. Which is wrong. That line can make conflict among Odia people. As wikipedia is a popular website. As odia bramhins says them ksatriyas. Sekharblack123 (talk) 01:21, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia articles must not contain original research. Wikipedia articles should be based on reliable, published sources. Readers must be able to check that any of the information within Wikipedia articles is not just made up. This means all material must be attributable to reliable, published sources. Additionally, quotations and any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be supported by inline citations. Wikipedia may contain content that some readers consider objectionable or offensive‍—‌even exceedingly so. Chariotrider555 (talk) 12:31, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sekharblack123, you are invited to the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Sekharblack123! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Keelan (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

I am not able to replay on teahouse in the khandayat section. Sekharblack123 (talk) 12:51, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Outside of India, using "Sir" or "Madam" while not knowing the sex of the person or persons one is addressing confuses/upsets some people. which derailed the replies you wanted. I have no knowledge of caste systems, hence of no value to you. But again, the proper place for disputes is the Talk page of the article. IT will be essential to provide references to support your position. David notMD (talk) 14:13, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In india when we write a application we use "sir" for giving respect. Sekharblack123 (talk) 15:15, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Understood. But you saw the distraction it led to at Teahouse. David notMD (talk) 01:24, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

[edit]

Read your comment on chasa caste. We should raise our voice. Someone is deliberately doing this. S Das0406 (talk) 16:51, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]