User talk:Seresin/Archive 16
This page is an archive of User Talk:Seresin (or perhaps something else). If you wish to discuss something here, feel free to The history for this page is here, not on the main talk page. Thanks.
Until August 2007 — September 2007
I saw you close Hub hub, at AFD and in the page log. The AFD was only open for 34 minutes. The rationale in the AFD was "delete" and in the page was "deleted "Hub hub" (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hub hub)", which indicates there was a valid AFD that decided to delete. I would have to disagree. I do agree with the outcome (and !voted in the AFD), but I don't think you can call that a valid AFD, and I don't think that it qualified under speedy (which doesn't matter, since you didn't close under speedy). Just concerned over the policy implications of doing that. PHARMBOY (moo) (plop) 21:11, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
- I speedy deleted it under A1; I believe when I clicked the delete option in the AfD closing script, it automatically deleted it with a link to the AfD as a summary. I've clarified why I speedy deleted it at the AfD. seresin ( ¡? ) 21:27, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
The AfD closes you asked me about...
Done, added to the AfDs. If you'd like more info, please let me know. I think I read the consensus right, if you have a different opinion, I'd like to hear it please as there are always different ways to see things. TravellingCari 14:21, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
I'm surprised that you removed the PROD on this article. Are you really saying that Wikipedia should have a page on every CEO? I thought that WP:BIO indicated that you had to be notable, this person certainly fails WP:BIO.Paste (talk) 21:26, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
- Not necessarily, but those sources are certainly enough to warrant a full AfD of the article, which you are, of course, fully free to open should you be convinced the subject of the article fails WP:NOTE. seresin ( ¡? ) 22:32, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
|The Mizu onna sango15 Barnstar|
|Thank you to all who participated in my RFA- regardless of whether you supported or opposed,
I see that you are now working on the "Arbitration Report" ("T.R.O.L.L.") page for the "Signpost". If you ever have any questions about the arbitration process or the status of cases, I'd be glad to answer them. Regards, Newyorkbrad (talk) 23:56, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you for your offer. If I have any questions, I will do so. seresin ( ¡? ) 23:02, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
This article was split off from the main article of the show he was in. Could you please drop by the discussion and change your vote to a merge back to where it came from, or explain why you are not supporting a merge so other commenters have the full story. - Mgm|(talk) 20:47, 24 November 2008 (UTC)