User talk:Serienfan555

December 2022

Hello, I'm The Banner. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to List of programmes broadcast by Zee TV have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. WP:NOTTVGUIDE The Banner talk 13:07, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello the banner, that would have to be discussed in the wiki disk. Since the English Wikipedia has all been edited according to this principle with upcoming productions for years. However, I think it is unequal and unfair if wikis like Netflix and Amazon are retained but smaller networks are treated differently. I can partly understand the concern about the advertising effect, but in the English-speaking area there are so many film and series productions that it makes sense to divide them into upcoming productions.

Have a nice day, serial fan555 :) Serienfan555 (talk) 10:31, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is a discussion going on to stop that difference. The Banner talk 10:51, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to List of programs broadcast by Star Vijay. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. And at least start using a script that is suitable for ENWP The Banner talk 08:42, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at List of programmes broadcast by StarPlus, you may be blocked from editing. The Banner talk 19:45, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

there are start date and evidence for. There must be a policy discussion on wikipedia. But you can't just make massive changes by individuals like you did with the Amazon listing. many people have worked on it.

greeting series fan555

there are start date and evidence for. There must be a policy discussion on wikipedia. But you can't just make massive changes by individuals like you did with the Amazon listing. many people have worked on it.

greeting series fan555 Serienfan555 (talk) 19:53, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Did you ever read WP:NOTVGUIDE? The Banner talk 20:14, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Serienfan555! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Ravensfire (talk) 15:50, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Sid95Q. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Please check WP:ICTFSOURCES and WP:RS to know which source is considered reliable. Sid95Q (talk) 05:04, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

Hello, I'm ManaliJain. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. ManaliJain (talk) 10:30, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Telenovelafan215 (talk) 02:57, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Das Küstenrevier moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Das Küstenrevier. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Jeraxmoira (talk) 14:04, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Das Küstenrevier (December 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Das Küstenrevier and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 20:25, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Serienfan555! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 20:25, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Das Küstenrevier has been accepted

Das Küstenrevier, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

The Herald (Benison) (talk) 08:49, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Serienfan555. Thank you for your work on Die Landarztpraxis. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 18:48, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]