User talk:Sh456096

Sh456096, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Sh456096! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Brian Wyvill (December 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Paul W was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Subject, on first reading, appears notable, but sourcing currently fails to demonstrate notability per WP:PROF, ie: being the subject of significant coverage that can be verified in independent, reliable, secondary sources. Too much reliance is placed on materials that may well have been originally written by the subject, or which are routine profiles used for PR purposes (eg, while he was at SIGGRAPH). ImDB is not a reliable source; and the reliability and independence of other sources is unclear; the 'ShapeShop' inline citation is a broken link. I have tidied up some of the referencing/punctuation issues, added some wikilinks, and removed some external links (per WP:EL), but more work is needed

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Brian Wyvill and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Brian Wyvill, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Paul W (talk) 17:23, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Brian Wyvill (December 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Paul W was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Superficially appears notable, but current draft does not show subject meets WP:PROF: ie: having significant coverage in independent, reliable, secondary sources. The article is heavily dependent on materials that may have been written by the subject or by associates of the subject (eg at SIGGRAPH); IMDb is not a reliable source; the ShapeShop citation goes to a broken link. I have tidied up some formatting issues, removed some external links (per WP:EL) and added some wikilinks, but the submitter should look to improve the sourcing.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Brian Wyvill and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Brian Wyvill, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Paul W (talk) 17:35, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Brian Wyvill

Hello, Sh456096. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Brian Wyvill".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 00:38, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]