User talk:Shadotall

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Shadotall, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi Shadotall! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Rosiestep (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

19:19, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

March 2016[edit]

Since the International Cinephile Society does not appear to be notable enough to be the subject of a Wikipedia article, it is unlikely that any of the drafts you have created will be, and if you move them to article space they are likely to be deleted. Do you intend to move them to article space, or are you expecting to just keep them indefinitely as userspace sandbox pages? The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 14:42, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello - As you can see I'm new here and still learning the ropes. My impression was that the deletion of the old International Cinephile Society pages was because at that time the organization was perhaps too small to be considered notable, or maybe whoever created the pages hadn't provided adequate references. I've cited (or will be citing, lol, since I'm still learning Wikipedia's styles and markup) quite a few solid references for this type of film awards group, including Variety, Indiewire, Micropsia, La Nacion, Le Monde, Alt Film Guide, Altyazi, Ioncinema, etc. This seems consistent with references provided by the Online Film Critics Society, San Francisco Film Critics, and Broadcast Film Critics, except that the ICS article is more international in flavor. Sorry to be taking so long with my sandbox pages, but I'm trying to put together a complete set of pages with proper links before submitting them for consideration by you and other editors. Is this the right procedure? Do you feel that the group's notability is still in question? They've grown to about 100 members, including well-known critics and scholars from both the US/Canada and Europe, and the website they created in 2010 now has extensive film festival coverage, plus over 450 film reviews and essays. Shadotall (talk) 08:28, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:International Cinephile Society, from its old location at User:Shadotall/sandbox/International Cinephile Society. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. /wiae /tlk 14:27, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:  The comment they left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SwisterTwister talk 08:05, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Shadotall. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "International Cinephile Society".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 18:48, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]