User talk:Shahfahad123

January 2023

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. [1] MrOllie (talk) 14:08, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. MrOllie (talk) 14:13, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. MrOllie (talk) 14:16, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 13:59, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

reason=I am not an advertiser. I am a news editor and i didnt know it is against the rules and regulations of wikipedia to self promote or add links. From now on i am not going to self promote or add links to wikipedia Shahfahad123 (talk) 14:35, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

can you plz unblock me Shahfahad123 (talk) 14:36, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Shahfahad123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand why wikipedia blocked me cause i have edited external links. I am not going to do that again and i will try to be more responsive so can you please unblock me Shahfahad123 (talk) 15:33, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

For any chance at being unblocked, you will need to make the Terms of Use required paid editing disclosure, agree not to edit about or link to your website or its clients, and be more specific about what topics you might edit about. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 18:24, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What edits do you plan to make? What is your association with the website you were linking to? 331dot (talk) 16:24, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am new to wikipedia i didint know wikipedias rules and regulations now i have understand wikipedias rules and regulation and now i am going to follow terms of wikipedia i am not going to add links on wikipedia and i will edit article about medias and news. please accept my request

You will need to make a new unblock request for someone else to review. 331dot (talk) 19:46, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Shahfahad123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am new to wikipedia and i didnt know the rule and regulation of wikipedia so can you please unblock. I am not going to add links off any website on wikipedia

Decline reason:

Same as previous request. At this point I think I really have to ask you to consider if your English language skills are good enough to be doing this. You may find it easier to contribute to the Wikipedia in your native language. — Daniel Case (talk) 07:51, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Shahfahad123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The block is no longer necessary because i have understand that i was blocked for inappropriate links and i will not going to add inappropriate link again instead i am going to make productive contributions to wikipedia

Shahfahad123 (talk) 09:16, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You need to make a paid editing disclosure, and you need to be more specific about what topics you might edit about. I am declining your request. PhilKnight (talk) 15:36, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Shahfahad123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear [Administrator], I am writing to request that my account be unblocked. I understand that I made a mistake and I take full responsibility for my actions. I would like to assure you that I will not repeat the same mistake and I will comply with all the terms and conditions of wikipedia. I apologize for any inconvenience that my actions may have caused and I hope that you will consider my request for unblocking my account. I value the community and the platform, and I would like to continue participating in it. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, [Shahfahad123]

Decline reason:

Please read this carefully: as it has been stated repeatedly above, an unblock request will not be granted until you declare any conflict of interests you have, including paid editing disclosures. In future requests, please answer the following: 1) Has anyone or any company compensated you for editing an article on Wikipedia? This compensation can be money or other rewards. 2) Have you edited any articles that you have a conflict of interest with, either because of a personal connection, employment with the company (even if not paid to edit Wikipedia as part of that employment) or being paid to edit? If so, which articles are these? Z1720 (talk) 02:31, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.