User talk:Sharifneuro

Welcome!

Hello, Sharifneuro, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! JFW | T@lk 20:41, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:MED[edit]

You may want to join WP:MED, our medical contributors' panel. We can always use someone with a background in neurology! JFW | T@lk 20:41, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Evolution, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 20:05, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Evolution, are considered vandalism and immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 18:43, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your user page[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia.
While we appreciate that you enjoy using Wikipedia, please note that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a free webhosting service. Wikipedia is not a place to post personal content, host personal websites, or do things that are not directly related to adding to or improving the encyclopedia, as you did at User:Sharifneuro. Off-topic material may be deleted at any time. This message is not meant to discourage you from editing Wikipedia but rather to remind you that the ultimate goal of this website is to build an encyclopedia. Thank you. --Calton | Talk 01:33, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

March 2008[edit]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
Your continued joking or trolling at Talk:Evolution is disruptive and considered vandalism. You will be blocked from editing Wikipedia if you continue. Tim Vickers (talk) 19:58, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

dude[edit]

If you want to criticize evolution at least gain a grasp of the fundamentals. Evolution does not have anything to do with the origin of life. Nothing whatsoever. Evolution deals with how species, well, evolve, not how life began. Seriously. Angry Christian (talk) 20:11, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your comments[edit]

Dear Dr. Shariful Islam,

You say, based on your interpretations of Darwinists' beliefs, that all Darwinists should be condemned to death. What gives you the right to make such judgements? Are you not taking the place of God as Judge when you do so, just as you accuse Darwinists of taking the place of Creator?

Furthermore, your understanding of "Darwinists" is incorrect. There is nothing in evolutionary theory that is incompatible with the idea of a Creator. It is merely what we have learned from observing the world - that is, the creation. Do you believe that God created the world to deceive us? That is not in the nature of God - the nature of God is truth. So how, then, could it be denying God to study God's works? You admit that God's power of creation is beyond our limited understanding - so why do you presume that what we have learned about evolution is not PART of God's power of creation? That this is all the working of God's plan? Do you believe that you have some special understanding of God's plan that others do not?

Examine yourself. I don't think you are as pure in your devotion to God as you believe. Graft | talk 23:10, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Facebook syndrome[edit]

The article Facebook syndrome has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Pure original research

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kindzmarauli (talk) 17:46, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Rama has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Rama was changed by Sharifneuro (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.876103 on 2016-06-08T17:00:23+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:00, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]