User talk:Shark32322

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Shark32322, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Murph9000 (talk) 13:49, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Shark32322, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Shark32322! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Osarius (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages![edit]

Hello, Shark32322. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Murph9000 (talk) 13:51, 16 September 2016 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

How was my Work at the Tom clancy pages[edit]

About the Work at tom clancy 
did i do well? Shark32322 (talk) 21:54, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Your recent edits have all contained problems and have been reverted. Among the problems were unexplained changes in facts, changes which were grammatically bad, unnecessary, or just did not seem like a constructive contribution. Overall, it gives the impression of someone who is intentionally trying to be disruptive. I am not the only person who has reverted your changes. Murph9000 (talk) 22:11, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

My Edits were constructive[edit]

My Edits were connstructive because
It was Grammar fixes
and added useful info
Please do not revert
If you revert again
You will Go to Administrator Incident board

This edit to Donald Trump introduced grammatical errors, unnecessary wordiness, and a formatting error; all under the inaccurate edit summary of "Added Info About Trump" (no information was added). Murph9000 (talk) 23:06, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This edit to Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon (2001 video game) introduced a factual error under the edit summary of "Refined content". Murph9000 (talk) 23:16, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This edit to Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six 3: Raven Shield introduced a grammatical error under the edit summary of "Added content about rainbow six" (no content was actually added). Murph9000 (talk) 23:21, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This edit to Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six: Rogue Spear introduced a grammatical error under the summary of "Corrected Grammer". Murph9000 (talk) 23:26, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, Shark32322. Couple of things. You don't need to indent when posting to talk pages. To obtain indentation simply type a colon prior to typing the desired text. Normally one does not start a new section to reply to talk page posts. Just indent using the colon and make your reply. The indentation shows that your post is a reply. Also, having one's edits reverted is not a reason to post to the incidents notice board. Your report here, likewise, is not an incident that required a report. Your subsequent edits to your report indicates that you may be unaware of the "Show preview" button just to the right of the "Save changes" button. Employing this function cuts down on history clutter and reduces the likelihood for edit conflicts. I'll watchlist this page in the event you have any questions. Tiderolls 06:04, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Shy-Boy (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Someguy1221 (talk) 06:05, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]