User talk:ShawnSindelar

April 2021

Hello, I'm Jackfork. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Jessica Simpson have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Jackfork (talk) 00:46, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jessica Simpson. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Jackfork (talk) 00:48, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Jessica Simpson, you may be blocked from editing. Tahmid02016 (talk) 00:58, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Jessica Simpson. SkyWarrior 00:59, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. – Muboshgu (talk) 01:08, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ShawnSindelar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am sorry for my disruptive behavior. ShawnSindelar (talk) 01:10, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

An apology is a good start, but please tell us what edits you wish to make, such as what articles or topic areas, that will benefit Wikipedia. 331dot (talk) 07:10, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock 2

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ShawnSindelar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will unblock me. ShawnSindelar (talk) 13:49, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Pcgmsrich, you aren't very subtle. Yamla (talk) 15:11, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock 3

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ShawnSindelar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked similar to Pcgmsrich and I am sorry for my disruptive behavior. ShawnSindelar (talk) 14:09, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Confirmed sock. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:35, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Since this user is a sock of a globally locked account, further unblock requests here are pointless as none of us can accept them. Daniel Case (talk) 05:38, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Daniel Case (talk) 05:37, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]