User talk:Shayer2

References?[edit]

Hi, I saw your edits here. Wikipedia requires that content be verifiable. Do you have any reliable sources you can add to the article to support your addition? Otherwise, the content is likely to be removed. Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:40, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 12:51, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Shayer2, though I appreciate your effort to find references for the content you submitted here at Khaleda Zia, we can't use Wikipedia for a reference. So if you can find the original references (they might be linked in the articles you are citing) that would be appreciated, otherwise the info will likely be removed from the article. Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:19, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is your final warning: Stop copy/pasting copyrighted content into Wikipedia articles as you did in these three edits. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:10, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ANI[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:24, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for copyright violations. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Diannaa (talk) 22:02, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Shayer2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am sorry that I violated copyright rules, I just need one chance and I won't do it, I will respect the rules of wikipedia

Decline reason:

Sorry, but we need a bit more than that. You need to show (not say) that you understand why you were blocked. If you post another unblock request, you will need to:

Explain what copyright is
Explain why Wikipedia cannot host copyrighted content
Tell us what you plan to do in future to make sure that you don't violate copyright again

Simply saying, "I broke the rules, I won't do it again," does not show us that you know what rules you broke, and therefore that you know how to avoid breaking them in the future. Yunshui ^雲 _水 08:10, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Shayer2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

copyright is a right given to an originator for a fixed number of years to publish a material. Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted information because of legal reasons and because you do not have permission from the copyright holder. I have violated the rules of wikipedia by adding copyrighted material, thus I have violated and broken the rules. In the future I wish to use reliable sources for the edits I make on articles and I will not add copyrighted material to wikipedia without the permission of the holder. I can assure you that this mistake will not happen again. Regards, Shayer2 Shayer2 (talk) 10:22, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural: active unblock request is below. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 07:13, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Why did it happen at all? And why, after two warnings to stop, and a notification that you had been reported for administrative intervention, did you add copyrighted content over three more edits and fail to respond to any of the warnings? Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:48, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry I did not check my talk page. I went directly to editing Khaleda Zia. Afterwards I checked my talk page and wanted to delete everything but Diannaa already blocked me. I am really sorry for all of this mess.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Shayer2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

copyright is a right given to an originator for a fixed number of years to publish a material. Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted information because of legal reasons and because you do not have permission from the copyright holder. I have violated the rules of wikipedia by adding copyrighted material, thus I have violated and broken the rules. In the future I wish to use reliable sources for the edits I make on articles and I will not add copyrighted material to wikipedia without the permission of the holder. I can assure you that this mistake will not happen again.

Decline reason:

Procedural decline; duplicate of open unblock request above. Please post only one unblock request at a time.Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 18:11, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Re unblock request[edit]

Though the user's unblock request seems genuine at face value, I'm a little uncomfortable endorsing an unblock, because not only did the user copy/paste whole sections of content from various sources, which demonstrates a fundamental lack of understanding of academic honesty, ("don't copy" is a lesson we all learn in kindergarten) but they also resubmitted that same lifted content after it had been reverted numerous times. I'm also finding it hard to believe that the user didn't see the big red notifications next to their name when they came back to edit multiple times. Oh, also the user copy/pasted the dictionary definition of copyright into his unblock request. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:42, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I`d say he should just be unblocked per WP:ROPE. If he keeps up the behavior and Is just trying to get a sympathetic admin to unblock him so he can continue to edit disruptively, we can block him again and leave him be. Cheers! Happy Attack Dog (you rang?) 02:15, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Shayer2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand that Wikipedia cannot allow it's editors to insert copyrighted information to it's articles. Copyright is a a right given to someone for a fixed number of years to publish. Wikipedia's administrators cannot allow copyrighted information to be inserted because of legal reasons. Instead of listening I inserted copyrighted material to Khaleda Zia. I have by doing so violated and broken the rules of Wikipedia. Yu have my assurance that this will not happen again. I do hereby wish to insert information to articles from reliable and valid sources.

Decline reason:

When even your sample edit to show you properly understand copyright needs to be redacted as a copyright violation, I have ZERO confidence that you understand WP:COPYRIGHT and WP:CLOSEPARAPHRASE at all - this is a danger to the project the panda ₯’ 11:20, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hello Shayer2. I am disinclined to unblock, because all the content you added was directly copied from the sources; none of it seems to have been original material written by yourself. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, as it's against the law. I need to be sure that you understand how to write material in your own words that is based on good sources and does not have to be reverted or removed. So to ensure that you understand how to edit here, could you please give an example of an edit you would like to perform? Which article? Which sources? What content would you add? Thanks. -- Diannaa (talk) 01:50, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In order to give you an example of an edit I would like to perform in Khaleda Zia, could you tell me where I should put the edit — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shayer2 (talk • contribs)

You can post the example edit here on your user talk page. -- Diannaa (talk) 19:20, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

''''Example of Edit on Khaleda Zia

(Redacted)

I don't see any substantial difference between this content above, and the content at http://www.banglapedia.org/HT/Z_0016.htm, which you've cited. You've basically copied and pasted six paragraphs from Banglapedia, and changed a few words here and there, but it is identical in substance. This further demonstrates to that you don't understand what plagiarism is, or why it is problematic. If you had submitted the content above into the article, I would have reverted it for blatant copyvio. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:03, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry but the content is a copyright violation and cannot be added to the encyclopedia. You can see at the bottom of the source page the message "©Copyright Banglapedia 2012. All Rights Reserved." That means it's illegal for you to copy the material over to our wiki. It should not even appear here on your talk page, so I have removed it. -- Diannaa (talk) 17:51, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have not copied the words inside wikipedia. I have written the words on my own even though some of them seem to be copied. I have not copy pasted the paragraphs and added words to it. I am sorry but that is the truth.