User talk:SheikhAzizulHakim

April 2017

Hello, I'm CAPTAIN RAJU. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Oath of office have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 20:16, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Oath of office has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Oath of office was changed by SheikhAzizulHakim (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.923972 on 2017-04-20T06:10:13+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:10, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copying from licensed sources requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you have inserted Creative Commons licensed text into Wikipedia, as you did at Draft:Pairwise Compatibility Graph. You are welcome to import appropriate Creative Commons licensed content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Compatibly-licensed sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any Creative Commons content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 22:59, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pairwise Compatibility Graph (December 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Caleb Stanford were:

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a dictionary. We cannot accept articles that are little more than definitions of words or abbreviations as entries. A good article should begin with a good definition, but expand on the subject. You might try creating a definition for this instead at Wiktionary, which is a dictionary. Please only do so if it meets that sister project's criteria for inclusion. These require among others, attestation for the word or phrase, as verified through clear widespread use, or its use in permanently recorded media, conveying meaning, in at least three independent instances spanning at least a year.

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Hi! Based on the Google Scholar link, the good news is I think this topic meets notability. However, it needs to be expanded and incorporate many of the more well-cited references listed at this link. Currently, it's just a definition and one fact, which IS helpful but needs significant improvement and someone would need to commit to bringing the article to Start class.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pairwise Compatibility Graph and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Pairwise Compatibility Graph, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Caleb Stanford (talk) 03:27, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SheikhAzizulHakim! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Caleb Stanford (talk) 03:27, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]