User talk:Shetarlo

Welcome![edit]

Hi Shetarlo! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! I dream of horses ^{(Contribs) (Talk)} 19:28, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why "hanNégev"?[edit]

Hi. I don't read Hebrew, so I don't know what you meant when you wrote that "dagesh" is all there is to know for haNegev actually transliterating to hanNegev. Are you sure? Never came across any other example. Sources? Happy to learn. Thanks, Arminden (talk) 20:06, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I now saw this: Dagesh hazaq. According to it, the doubling of consonants applies only to ancient, not to modern Hebrew, and nobody except very peculiar readers pronounce accordingly even in liturgical Torah recitations.

A) I don't know if Wiki goes by default (i.e., if not explicitly written) according to ancient, as opposed to modern Hebrew. I really don't think so.

B) Even if it does, is "hanNégev" the way to spell it in a precise transliteration, which uses certain codes (see accented e)? Did you study that? (See Romanization of Hebrew).

Thanks. Arminden (talk) 20:19, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I was in the middle of replying when you made your second comment. In any event, yes, it is dagesh hazak. I know Modern Hebrew dispatches with some of the older pronunciation traditions and the sounds change accordingly, but with that being said, strictly speaking the transliteration is not actually changed. If the word was spelled הַנֶגֶב – then the translit. would be haNégev – but since Modern Hebrew nonetheless preserves the spelling הַנֶּגֶב (as it would any other w/ certain initial consonants with a prefix), and the page does not specifically earmark Modern Hebrew (just linking the page for Hebrew) I would say it still is transliterated -nn-. As for the accented 'é', scholarly transliterations take or leave showing the stress of particular syllables in the notation, so there's a discussion to be had there. Shetarlo (talk) 20:25, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your Kuntillet Ajrud edits[edit]

You replaced a sourced fact with misleading crap, knock it off. Read the 76 paper and Krause BEFORE you mess with stuff. Read them like you're interested in the subject. Temerarius (talk) 01:08, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024[edit]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

GeneralNotability (talk) 01:21, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]