User talk:Silsurt

Silsurt, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Silsurt! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like ChamithN (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:09, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Blue Prism Group logo.svg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Blue Prism Group logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:32, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nexthink (August 27)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

press releases are not independent sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nexthink and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 10:14, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Theroadislong Thank you for your review of the draft. I found that of the sources included with the draft, none were press releases. Which source were you referring to as a press release and I am happy to remove that source if I have missed something. Silsurt (talk) 18:35, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I might have been mistaken, but the titles and content of the various sources have a LOT of similarities. Theroadislong (talk) 18:44, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The articles themselves are from independent publishers who reference company notoriety and is the reason for the draft submission as I think this makes them notable enough for a page. Silsurt (talk) 19:47, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Theroadislong I added a few more independent secondary sources to the draft noting additional coverage. Would these be sufficient for approval?

Draft:Nexthink Silsurt (talk) 22:21, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nexthink (September 14)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This is borderline as there are two references from the draft that would likely meet WP:ORGCRIT. However, I do not believe this would pass AfD.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nexthink and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CNMall41 (talk) 18:05, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Nexthink has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Nexthink. Thanks! CNMall41 (talk) 03:04, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @CNMall41

I have revised the draft to follow the ORGCRIT and Notability guidelines you referenced. The article sources meet the above criteria with multiple mentions from secondary independent sources that are reputable publications and staff writers. They also meet the guidelines on the Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources page. Thank you for your time and thorough examination of each draft. Silsurt (talk) 21:25, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nexthink (October 20)[edit]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by MaxnaCarta was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

MaxnaCarta (talk) 07:42, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Nexthink[edit]

Hello, Silsurt. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nexthink, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:01, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Nexthink[edit]

Hello, Silsurt. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Nexthink".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:31, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]