User talk:SilverWolf442

Welcome!

Hello, SilverWolf442, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 06:35, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Guidelines for fiction articles

Please see Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Writing about fiction, Wikipedia:Notability (fiction), Notability, Wikipedia's Golden Rule, and Your first article. DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 06:47, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Warda Wilson (July 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Not independently notable as by our notability policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Warda Wilson and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 21:35, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ellie Camacho (August 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bearcat was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

A comic book character does not qualify for a Wikipedia article just because you can technically "reference" it to the comic book itself. Reliable source coverage about her in sources independent of the comic book -- such as newspaper or magazine articles about her role in the comic book -- is what's required.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ellie Camacho and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bearcat (talk) 19:22, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! SilverWolf442, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Bearcat (talk) 19:22, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ellie Camacho

As long as they're being published by recognized science fiction or comic book or other geek-culture magazines, and not just on Wordpress or Blogspot blogs or the publishing company's own website, then yes, interviews where the comic's artists and writers are talking about her would help. Sources that represent fully third-party analysis by people who are completely independent of the comic would be even better, if possible, but the interviews would still be useful and helpful in establishing some notability. (Interviews are problematic if the interviewee is talking about themselves, but that's obviously not something a comic book character can do much of.) Bearcat (talk) 03:20, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may need to reread my first comment...if they're from Marvel's own self-published website about itself, then those interviews don't assist. What's necessary is coverage from external sources, such as geek-culture magazines that cover science fiction and/or comic books. Bearcat (talk) 16:39, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't say they can't be online, I said they can't be from Marvel's own website about itself. This is 2017, most magazines publish their content to the web and that's fine — but what the sources have to be is independent of Marvel. Bearcat (talk) 00:11, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Warda Wilson concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Warda Wilson, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:37, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Ellie Camacho concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Ellie Camacho, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Warda Wilson

Hello, SilverWolf442. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Warda Wilson".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 22:01, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ellie Camacho

Hello, SilverWolf442. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ellie Camacho".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 18:01, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]