User talk:Slicedoranges

GigaFrag

The deleted text is here. Bear in mind that the notability should be verifiable and independent. It also reads a bit like an add - I'd take out the entry charge for a start. Please also read the notability criteria here. Thanks, jimfbleak 06:23, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, good luck, I'll be interested to see if you can get this one through. jimfbleak 06:45, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

W00t

A DRV has been opened for W00t. Please comment. Thanks! -- weirdoactor ^t^|^c 01:55, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

El D...

All in a day's work. Keep up the great editing! --Kukini 03:08, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A question

Why do you blank your talk page instead of archiving it? Would you like me to help you learn how to create archives? I noticed you deleted the welcome I gave you as well as other notices. Most of us believe it is better to archive talk pages than delete them. --Kukini 03:10, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you decide to do something like this [1], let me know, and I can help. --Kukini 03:19, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Statements of comparison

Hi, SlicedO, statements such as this: "It has only had one graduating class thus far and has already statistically been the most proficient school in the Visalia Unified School District in several district-wide exams" require verification. I will need to remove it shortly if it is not verified (with a url link hopefully). Much thanks! --Kukini 16:45, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Gigafrag.jpg

Your image Image:Gigafrag.jpg is copyrighted, and used with permission. However, you seem to also have licensed it under the GFDL. Which is it? Thanks. --Strangerer (Talk) 22:29, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Gigafrag.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Gigafrag.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Remember the dot ^(talk) 19:22, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Paintroller.PNG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Paintroller.PNG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 18:03, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Eldiamante.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Eldiamante.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:30, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The 39 Clues Task Force

Hello, Slicedoranges! I'd like to invite you to join the 39 Clues Task Force. We work on improving 39 Clues articles and would appreciate your help. Just add your name to the list of members to join! Cheers! ℳøℕø 01:25, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:43, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"Paint Roller (Kirby)" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Paint Roller (Kirby) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 25 § Paint Roller (Kirby) until a consensus is reached. QuicoleJR (talk) 15:46, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Qfusion

The article Qfusion has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources or apparent notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Icemat.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Icemat.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:17, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]