User talk:Socialgoverment

Welcome!

Hello, Socialgoverment, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one of your contributions does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Your article on James T Butts Jr needs WP:Neutral sources. Do you have articles from local newspapers or the L.A. Times? If so, rely on those instead of your own feelings or on campaign materials. Just put the citations right in the body of the article, if you want, and I will WP:Wikify them for you. Sincerely, your friend, GeorgeLouis (talk) 23:58, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

Hello, I'm Harry. I noticed that you recently removed some content from James T. Butts, Jr. with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Harry (talk) 20:04, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to James T. Butts, Jr., without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Even though you contributed the initial text, you cannot control the form or content of the article after other editors collaborate to improve the article. —C.Fred (talk) 20:15, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at James T. Butts, Jr., you may be blocked from editing. The sections of text you delete appear to be backed up with reliable sources. Rather than make a blanket claim, you need to address specific concerns with the sources. You also need to focus on the content of the article, not the other editors involved. —C.Fred (talk) 20:20, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to James T. Butts, Jr.. — MusikAnimal ^talk 20:20, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at James T. Butts, Jr. shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Please see WP:OWN. Just because you started that article once it doesn't mean that it's yours to do with as you please. Sjö (talk) 20:21, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Social. I think it would help if you gave the article a fresh read. I think you'll find that the politic attack content has already been dealt with and any remaining undue emphasis on that kind of material is minor and nuanced. CorporateM (Talk) 20:38, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Socialgoverment reported by User:Sjö (Result: ). Thank you. Sjö (talk) 20:40, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistent disruptive editing and edit warring, as you did at James T. Butts, Jr.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. — MusikAnimal ^talk 20:40, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]