User talk:Spoananung

November 2022[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Acroterion (talk) 04:08, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please if my page Spoananung can get another reviewer, since I don't believe in Theroadislong objectivity..Thank you Spoananung (talk) 21:34, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nobody will see your request here, you can re-submit and I will leave it to another reviewer, but I can guarantee the outcome will be the same. Theroadislong (talk) 21:42, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Spoananung (November 30)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Wikipedia cannot reference itself.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Spoananung and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 16:28, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi.

As you will find out. I made some edits on my Wikipedia page Spoananung. For the future I don't see anymore much reasons about subject discussion around named article.

From my point of view is article correct. Also I don't give much on by your opinion in-depth and independence of the subject, since my article is based on fact truth and not on left media fake news.

I also believe Wikipedia give more space and freedom to less objective contents, so this is it from my point of view. Maybe Teahouse will be more understanding, Best Regards Spoananung (talk) 21:05, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Spoananung! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 16:28, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Spoananung (November 30)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Sites Google and Wikipedia are NOT reliable sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Spoananung and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 21:14, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Acroterion (talk) 00:20, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Acroterion!

I don't believe anymore in objectivity of Wikipedia, and don't see any differences between my article and for example this one. I understand there needs to be some principles and rules, but then they must be for all of us.

You will not convince me in attachment here is no advertising or promotion.That's why I don't understand what are you trying to impose. This is my last try for publishing on Wikipedia. Best Regards Spoananung (talk) 04:52, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

P.S.A.i.K. company Therapia is so called title for companion therapia and not for company like IKEA or similar, because it is movement. Spoananung (talk) 12:52, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

p Spoananung (talk) 12:43, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]