User talk:Sqa rizvi
Image copyright problem with Image:DPO Structure .jpeg.jpg
[edit]
Thank you for uploading Image:DPO Structure .jpeg.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 16:59, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of New article for wikipedia
[edit]A tag has been placed on New article for wikipedia, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. NAHID 19:34, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of New article for wikipedia
[edit]A tag has been placed on New article for wikipedia, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Torchwood Who? (talk) 19:51, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of New article for wikipedia
[edit]A tag has been placed on New article for wikipedia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Excirial (Talk,Contribs) 19:51, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
March 2008
[edit] Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, such as New article for wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Skomorokh 19:54, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with New article for wikipedia. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Tan | 39 20:00, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
I've moved your work-in-progress from 'New article for wikipedia' to your own user space sandbox. When you are ready with the article, copy-and-paste it to its final location. Please take care not to re-create an *article* called 'New article', but instead, give it a name appropriate for the subject, for example 'Polyphenyl ethers'. Thanks. -- Fullstop (talk) 20:13, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
Proposed Image Deletion
[edit]
A deletion discussion has just been created at Category talk:Unclassified Chemical Structures, which may involve one or more orphaned chemical structures, that has you user name in the upload history. Please feel free to add your comments. Ronhjones (Talk) 23:07, 10 June 2011 (UTC)