User talk:Steve Hart

Please note:
If you start a discussion here I will respond here (unless asked otherwise) to keep discussions centralized. Thank you.

--

framing merge proposal

Please see Talk:Framing (sociology). - Grumpyyoungman01 14:01, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

email?

Hi Steve. You recently voted on List of Jewish Fellows of the Royal Society. There's a strong possibility the user who stacked the previous AFDs is now resorting to canvassing inclusionist users by email to !vote on the afd. I wanted to know if you were possibly emailed and then ended up voting the opposite to what the canvasser expected. For example, read the preface to JMabel's comment. Thanks for any information. Bulldog123 03:42, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

No, I wasn't emailed -- Steve Hart 13:29, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

Twice now

Hey there. I wanted to say hi and thanks for your comments at the AfD for Jerusalemite. This is the second time that an article I created has benefited from you valuable input (The other being the now defunct Flying checkpoint which will be merged, as per your excellent suggestion to Checkpoint (military). Anyway, I thought I would tell you that your comments and input are much appreciated and it's to see an editor with your sense for organization and fairness around. Cheers. Tiamat 16:34, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

Thanks, appreciated -- Steve Hart 16:54, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

Hi Steve. It wasn't at all out of line to invite me back to discuss the issue. Unfortunately I don't feel I can add anything more than what has already been said. If you can find any better evidence for use of Jerusalemite as used for "person of faith", then I will probably change my vote. Regards, Number 57 08:02, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

Jamaat-ul-Mujahideen Bangladesh

Thanks for taking an interest in the article. While I am pretty sure that the article needs much improvement, I would like to have some help there. Could you point to specific peacock/weasel words and POV problems on the articles' talk page? I have some time on my hand to work on the article. Aditya^{(talk • contribs)} 04:42, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:Western-Wall-Jerusalem-2005.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Western-Wall-Jerusalem-2005.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Western-Wall-Jerusalem-2005.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Polly (Parrot) 00:12, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of descendants of Nazi officials

The article List of descendants of Nazi officials has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is basically "list of people with bad parents". It verges on WP:UNDUE - we're basically grouping together a number of otherwise unremarkable people and saying, "Look at them! Their parents were Nazis! Shame! Shame! Evil!"

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. NellieBly (talk) 01:11, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of List of descendants of Nazi officials for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of descendants of Nazi officials is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of descendants of Nazi officials until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. NellieBly (talk) 03:30, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)