Jump to content

User talk:Stig morten 93

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Prison Break episodes

[edit]

Hi. You recently edited List of Prison Break episodes by adding future episode titles. Although the titles may be correct and TV.com is listed as a source, they are, as yet, unconfirmed by the official Fox press release. They are usually released one week prior to the episode airdate in the US. For this reason, please refrain from creating new articles for the future episodes until the airdate or at least a few days before the airdate. Also, because of notability reasons, those articles you created maybe qualified for deletion since they are without content and are currently non-notable. Thus, please do not create new articles until or near the airdate. For more information, see Wikipedia:Notability. Thank you. Ladida 03:00, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Medium

[edit]

Read my edit summary. thanks/Fenton, Matthew Lexic Dark 52278 Alpha 771 18:26, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Seinfeld image

[edit]

I think the 1997 one is better. The one you put in, he has a weird expression on his face and his eyes are closed. I don't feel strongly enough about it to revert, but just thought I'd let you know. —Chowbok 20:42, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate your try to help with List of NCIS episodes by adding information, for example about the name of the final episode. Unfortunately, you, like the anonymous IP user (who knows a different name for it apparently), do not provide a source (see WP:V), thus I had to revert your edit back to the information on TV.com. If you have another reliable source for the episode list, I would be glad to hear it and you can feel free to re-add the info if you specify that source with <ref> and </ref> Tags (see WP:FN for usage). --SoWhy Talk 08:38, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please keep in mind WP:CIV and WP:AGF and avoid un-productive edits like this. --EEMeltonIV 14:22, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Bones season 2 dvd.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Bones season 2 dvd.jpg is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only" or "used with permission for use on Wikipedia only" which was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19 or is not used in any articles (CSD I3).

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Image:Bones season 2 dvd.jpg itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. If you have any questions about what to do next or why your image was nominated for speedy deletion please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thanks. --Android Mouse Bot 2 14:04, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:250px-Mitchelllost.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:36, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Smallville_season_6_cover.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:44, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Commercial use of Image:I232521359 667.jpg

[edit]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:I232521359 667.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:I232521359 667.jpg is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only" or "used with permission for use on Wikipedia only" which was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19 or is not used in any articles (CSD I3).

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Image:I232521359 667.jpg itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. If you have any questions about what to do next or why your image was nominated for speedy deletion please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thanks. --Android Mouse Bot 2 17:47, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Commercial use of Image:Spiderman3-4.jpg

[edit]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Spiderman3-4.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Spiderman3-4.jpg is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only" or "used with permission for use on Wikipedia only" which was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19 or is not used in any articles (CSD I3).

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Image:Spiderman3-4.jpg itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. If you have any questions about what to do next or why your image was nominated for speedy deletion please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thanks. --Android Mouse Bot 2 17:48, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Jackjulietglasswall_1.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:33, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandal in Ghost Whisperer

[edit]

Why did erase that afterlife Section!? I worked hard on it. What do you mean it is not nesscary!? Why do you have to be such a vandal and an idiot!? What do you mean Ghost Whisperer doesn't need it!? If you delete any of my work again I will report you to an admin!!!!!!I will tell them you vandalized my contribution!I have a better Idea! If you erase any of my contrubutions,I will erase all of yours!!!!!!!!!(-:< So don't make such a stupid mistake again or its cleaners for you! Sorry I am not keeping a cool head, but I don't want you vandalizing my hard work. So watch it, vandal!--Angel David,?!?, 22:08, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

All is forgiven

[edit]

I forgive you and your apology is accepted. actually it is I who should be apologizing to you. I was too hard on you. So I am sorry for what I did--Angel David, ?!?,14:00, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pauley Perrette

[edit]

I'm not sure who is adding in the date and episode count, but no one is trying to say Pauley Perrette has quit NCIS. It's simply a way to say how long she's been starring in the show so far, in between seasons. Kat, Queen of Typos 17:06, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, adding content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. This is especially important when dealing with biographies of living people, but applies to all Wikipedia articles. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are already familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add your original reference to the article. Thank you. Alientraveller (talk) 20:07, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]


i'm not new at wikipedia... i have been a member over a year... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stig morten 93 (talkcontribs)

It's not the years, it's the mileage. Please think before you add uncited and potentially uncorrect information. Alientraveller (talk) 20:13, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
What he means is that you need to show evidence for information that you add to an article. For example, if you look at Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull#References, that is the evidence used to support information in the body of the article. This is in line with Wikipedia's policy of verifiability because otherwise, anyone can add anything they want without knowing if their information is genuine or not. Let me know if you have any questions about this. —Erik (talkcontrib) - 20:19, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it is confirmed that it's cancelled. TV Guide, noted authority on television, has reported that it is definite the series is cancelled. The link is in the series article. KellyAna (talk) 15:42, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:31, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]