User talk:Straightarrow.chad

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Anders Sörman-Nilsson

A tag has been placed on Draft:Anders Sörman-Nilsson requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

copy vio but source is on the spam blacklist and can't be quoted on a G12 submission

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 03:47, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted per {{db-g11}} as spam (it was copied from the "Ode Management" speaker bureau website that lists him.) – Athaenara ✉ 04:56, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of Interest

Hello, Straightarrow.chad. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. – Athaenara ✉ 04:56, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

– Athaenara ✉ 04:56, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Straightarrow.chad (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Good day! I want to apologize for not reading your guidelines in contributing on Wikipedia. Promotion and advertising is not my sole purpose in joining Wikipedia. I plan to submit an article which I think will help Wikipedia and not just to promote. Anders is a speaker same as Chris Riddell, Ross Dawson whose already on your website. I can disclose anything as required

Decline reason:

This does not address your apparent violations of WP:COI. You will not be unblocked to write about Anders Sörman-Nilsson or any other subject areas for which you have a conflict of interest. If you disclose your conflict of interest and agree to refrain from any further edits in those subject areas and tell us what you'd edit instead, we'd be happy to consider unblocking you. Yamla (talk) 11:26, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.