User talk:Sucker28

Hi I'm Sucker28 kindly check the draft article I made yeaterday Draft:Philippine Supreme Court composition/2019 December 3

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (December 6)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by The Mirror Cracked was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

The Mirror Cracked (talk) 06:22, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sucker28! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! The Mirror Cracked (talk) 06:22, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to your Articles for Creation Help Desk question

Hello, Sucker28! I'm CaptainEek. I have replied to your question about a submission at the WikiProject Articles for Creation Help Desk. Captain Eek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 09:16, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Philippine Supreme Court composition/2019 December 3

May I Know if the template that i created has already been reviewed Sucker28 (talk) 11:50, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Sucker28/sandbox

Hello Sucker28,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username CaptainEek and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged your user-page at User:Sucker28/sandbox for deletion, because it appears to be using wikipedia as a personal web host.

If you feel that the page shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|CaptainEek}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Captain Eek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 19:36, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Orange Mike | Talk 02:14, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sucker28 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will no longer make disruptive edits and just to help other users with new things

Decline reason:

This unblock request has been declined due to your history of vandalism and/or disruption to this encyclopedia. However, we are willing to give you another chance provided that you can earn back the trust of the Wikipedia community. To be unblocked you need to demonstrate that you are willing and able to contribute positively to Wikipedia. You can do this by:

Familiarizing yourself with our basic rules.
Read our guide to improving articles.
Pick any pre-existing article you wish to improve.
If you have trouble choosing an article to improve, see this index of articles needing improvement for ideas. Once you have decided on the article you will propose improvements to:
1. Click the Edit tab at the top of that article;
2. Copy the portion of the prose from that article that you will be proposing changes to. However:
  - do not copy the "infobox" from the start of the article (i.e., markup like this: {{infobox name|...}});
  - do not copy any image placement code (i.e., markup like this: [[File:Name.jpg|thumb|caption]]);
  - do not copy the page's categories from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: [[Category:Name]]);
  - do not copy the stub tag (if there) from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: {{Foo stub}});
3. Click edit at your talk page, and paste at the bottom under a new section header (like this: == [[Article title]] ==) the copied content but do not save yet;
4. Place your cursor in the edit summary box and paste there an edit summary in the following form which specifies the name of the article you copied from and links to it (this is required for mandatory copyright attribution): "Copied content from [[exact Name of Article]]; see that article's history for attribution."
5. You can now save the page. However, if your edits will include citations to reliable sources (which they should), add the following template to the end of your prose: {{reflist-talk}}. Once you have added the template, click Publish changes.
Now, edit that content. Propose significant and well researched improvements by editing the selected portion of the article. Please note that we are not looking for basic typo corrections, or small unreferenced additions; your edits should be substantial, and reflect relevant policies.
When you are done with your work, re-request unblocking and an administrator will review your proposed edits.
- If we (including the original blocking admin) are convinced that your proposed edits will improve Wikipedia as an encyclopedia, you will be unblocked.

If you need help while working with your proposed edits, you may add "{{Help me|your question here ~~~~}}" to your talk page. Thank you. Yamla (talk) 11:08, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You'll also need to explain why you were making disruptive edits in the first place, and why on earth we should trust that you'll never do so again, given that you were deliberately harming Wikipedia just yesterday. --Yamla (talk) 11:08, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sucker28 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

to the administrators kindly review my block, please, i promise not to do any disruptive edits, I just thought of the things that I recently done its very bad because I wasn't giving good information but I was only damaging the articles

Decline reason:

Confirmed sock puppet of LABSJAY (talk · contribs). NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 19:36, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

If you are refusing to follow the path you were given toward being unblocked, please explicitly say so. Note this will count against any possibility of you being unblocked. --Yamla (talk) 13:34, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]