User talk:Sundostund: Difference between revisions

	Archive Archives
	1, 2, 3

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 16:01, 19 January 2012

This page may contain some text written in the Serbian language.

Help with Research!

Dear Sundostund,

I am writing a research paper on the history of Libyan political personnel and came across a wiki article you contributed to, which I translated from Arabic to English using google. The article is entitled “General People’s Committee” and can be accessed as follows: http://ar.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/اللجنة_الشعبية_العامة This article is exactly what I’m looking for, but there is a historical hole from 1990 – 2006. Do you have any idea why these dates are missing from the article? Do you have any information on this topic pertaining to 1990 – 2006 or know of any other sources I can consult to find the missing information? I have to submit my paper to my professor by Monday morning, so if you could prove any help at all, I would truly appreciate it! Please feel free to contact me directly via e-mail at agreen789@yahoo.com.

Thank you in advance for your time and hope to hear from you soon!

Sincerely, Ann Green --AGreen789 (talk) 20:14, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Helle Thorning-Schmidt

Please don't change the photo again. Thanks. Carstensen (talk) 22:28, 4 October 2011 (UTC) [reply]

Hello, Sundostund. You have new messages at Talk:Helle Thorning-Schmidt.
Message added 17:11, 5 October 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

You have performed vandalism on the Helle Thorning-Schmidt article multiple times today and multiple times over the past few days. If you repeat your vandalism, I will have to report you. Carstensen (talk) 02:55, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free files in your user space

Hey there Sundostund, thank you for your contributions! I am a bot, alerting you that non-free files are not allowed in user or talk space. I removed some files I found on User:Sundostund/Sandbox.

See a log of files removed today here.
Shut off the bot here.
Report errors here.
If you have any questions, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.

Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 05:08, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

November 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from List_of_Prime_Ministers_of_Nepal. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Hi, if you can contribute more to the article, please do so. However, please do not remove the portrait of the Prime ministers. I have tried hard to arrange that table. Any help would be good actually. But please do not remove the contents. DBhuwanSurfer (talk) 06:01, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Sundostund. You have new messages at Talk:List of kings of Iraq.
Message added 11:33, 5 December 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Claret Ash 11:33, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

General Secretary of the Workers' Party of Korea

Why did you restore the obviously false claim that Kim Il-sung became general secretary of the Communist Party at the age of 13? In fact, he was never the party's general secretary and only took a position of leadership when he was appointed by the Soviets after World War IL. Vale of Glamorgan (talk) 20:36, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tantawi

I have seen you reply to other people, so your refusal to reply to my questions is just dumbfounding. I have made repeated requests that you say why you keep adding Tantawi as President of Egypt. He is not the President, either actual, acting, or effective. If you continue to revert without discussion I will raise the issue at AN/I. I would rather not, but you just keep ignoring the discussion and keep reverting without saying a single word. nableezy - 16:27, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

RSK leader lists

In a 2007 arbitration case, administrators were given the power to impose discretionary sanctions on any user working on articles concerning the Balkans. Before any such sanctions are imposed, editors are to be put on notice of the decision. This notice is issued in view of your edits to Republic of Serbian Krajina. It is not to be taken as implying any inappropriate behaviour on your part, merely to warn you of the Arbitration Committee's decision. Thank you.

Please see Talk:Republic of Serbian Krajina#leader lists. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 22:53, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 57: / Line 57: @@
 Please see [[Talk:Republic of Serbian Krajina#leader lists]]. --[[User:Joy|Joy &#91;shallot&#93;]] ([[User talk:Joy|talk]]) 22:53, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
-==Unreadable colours==
-Your edits {{Querylink|List of Prime Ministers of Saint Kitts and Nevis|qs=&diff=471205316&oldid=458913406|here}} and {{Querylink|List of Prime Ministers of Saint Kitts and Nevis|qs=&diff=next&oldid=471284434|here}} were not edits but reverts of the article [[List of Prime Ministers of Saint Kitts and Nevis]] to previous versions, removing several non-controversial but crucial items, e.g. an interwiki link and typographical improvements. The lack of any edit summary in your reverts failed to documents this; please take note of [[WP:EDSUM]], [[WP:REV]] and especially [[WP:ROWN]]. My edit summaries, e.g. {{Querylink|List of Prime Ministers of Saint Kitts and Nevis|qs=&diff=prev&oldid=471284434|here}}, documented in detail my intentions. The main problem with the page is its use of colours which make it very hard to read and contradicts [[WP:COLOR]]. The blue on red colour combination especially violates every measure of acceptable screen colour contrast. You have now twice reverted reasonable edits without an edit summary. I suggest you revert your edit to restore a page which is in line with Wikipedia and indeed general Internet standards. -- [[User:Michael Bednarek|Michael Bednarek]] ([[User talk:Michael Bednarek|talk]]) 08:25, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
-:I assume your [[WP:SILENCE|silence]] means you agree with my points and so I have reverted your edit. -- [[User:Michael Bednarek|Michael Bednarek]] ([[User talk:Michael Bednarek|talk]]) 09:28, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
-::Wrong. Of course I don't agree with you. I just don't want to waste my time in such a trivial discussion. I have reverted your edit. -- [[User:Sundostund|Sundostund]] ([[User talk:Sundostund|talk]]) 12:43, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
-==[[Talk:List of Archbishops of Canterbury]]==
-Hi, an editor has raised questions on the above talk page about your changes to the related article and it would be appreciated if you could respond to their concerns. [[User:Nev1|Nev1]] ([[User talk:Nev1|talk]]) 19:33, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
-:I'd back up what Nev has said. I see four editors arguing against your edits there. Could you please not just edit war; [[WP:CONSENSUS|consensus]] is important and on this occasion it seems to be against you. Edit-warring will get you blocked; the way forward if it's important to change the article is to make good arguments in talk and thereby change the consensus or arrive at a new consensus which is a compromise. This is how we work. Also, could you please not use language like [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:List_of_Archbishops_of_Canterbury&diff=prev&oldid=471920419 this] again; we don't support homophobia here and further comments like this are also liable to get you blocked. Thanks a lot. --[[User:John|John]] ([[User talk:John|talk]]) 22:03, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

Archive Archives
1, 2, 3