User talk:Surena
 | This user may have left Wikipedia. Surena has not edited Wikipedia since 28 May 2012. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
Welcome
[edit]Welcome!
Hello, Surena, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!
Ϫ 04:59, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry case
[edit]
|
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mani1 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Elockid (Talk·Contribs) 20:05, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
- i am in fa.wikipedia.com .you cas see my history edits in this page and see my activity in this pagePassrain (talk) 12:16, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
Articles for deletion nomination of Disappear statues in tehran (2010)
[edit]
I have nominated Disappear statues in tehran (2010), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Disappear statues in tehran (2010). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. — e. ripley\talk 22:13, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
You forgot to transclude it on the BRFA page. FinalRapture - † ☪ 15:24, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
- okey, thanks►Surena/Discussion)29 Khordad 1389-- 17:38, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
BAGBot: Your bot request SurenaBot
[edit]Someone has marked Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/SurenaBot as needing your input. Please visit that page to reply to the requests. Thanks! AnomieBOT⚡ 01:20, 17 July 2010 (UTC) To opt out of these notifications, place {{bots|optout=operatorassistanceneeded}} anywhere on this page.
- Hi Surena, due to a lack of activity, I've marked your bot request for approval as expired. Please see the page for details. Feel free to reopen the BRfA at any time. - Kingpin13 (talk) 12:53, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
reverted commons move tag
[edit]I undid this tag you placed, since the version on commons seems defective; it doesn't include the history of versions, about which there is some dispute, and it mangles the code, and it has a different name. I'm not sure what the right way to handle this is. Dicklyon (talk) 16:51, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
The article Sandis khor has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Neologism that does not demonstrate sufficient notability.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ZZArch talk to me 20:48, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
EF 102
[edit]
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
NawlinWiki (talk) 19:55, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
Population update project
[edit]Hi. The 18th edition of Ethnologue just came out, and if we divide up our language articles among us, it won't take long to update them. I would appreciate it if you could help out, even if it's just a few articles (5,000 articles is a lot for just me), but I won't be insulted if you delete this request.
A largely complete list of articles to be updated is at Category:Language articles citing Ethnologue 17. The priority articles are in Category:Language articles with old Ethnologue 17 speaker data. These are the 10% that have population figures at least 25 years old.
Probably 90% of the time, Ethnologue has not changed their figures between the 17th and 18th editions, so all we need to do is change "e17" to "e18" in the reference (ref) field of the language info box. That will change the citation for the artcle to the current edition. Please put the data in the proper fields, or the info box will flag it as needing editorial review. The other relevant fields are "speakers" (the number of native speakers in all countries), "date" (the date of the reference or census that Ethnologue uses, not the date of Ethnologue!), and sometimes "speakers2". Our convention has been to enter e.g. "1990 census" when a census is used, as other data can be much older than the publication date. Sometimes a citation elsewhere in the article depends on the e17 entry, in which case you will need to change "name=e17" to "name=e18" in the reference tag (assuming the 18th edition still supports the cited claim).
Remember, we want the *total* number of native speakers, which is often not the first figure given by Ethnologue. Sometimes the data is too incompatible to add together (e.g. a figure from the 1950s for one country, and a figure from 2006 for another), in which case it should be presented that way. That's one use for the "speakers2" field. If you're not sure, just ask, or skip that article.
Data should not be displayed with more than two, or at most three, significant figures. Sometimes it should be rounded off to just one significant figure, e.g. when some of the component data used by Ethnologue has been approximated with one figure (200,000, 3 million, etc.) and the other data has greater precision. For example, a figure of 200,000 for one country and 4,230 for another is really just 200,000 in total, as the 4,230 is within the margin of rounding off in the 200,000. If you want to retain the spurious precision of the number in Ethnologue, you might want to use the {{sigfig}} template. (First parameter in this template is for the data, second is for the number of figures to round it off to.)
Dates will often need to be a range of all the country data in the Ethnologue article. When entering the date range, I often ignore dates from countries that have only a few percent of the population, as often 10% or so of the population isn't even separately listed by Ethnologue and so is undated anyway.
If Ethnologue does not provide a date for the bulk of the population, just enter "no date" in the date field. But if the population figure is undated, and hasn't changed between the 17th & 18th editions of Ethnologue, please leave the ref field set to "e17", and maybe add a comment to keep it so that other editors don't change it. In cases like this, the edition of Ethnologue that the data first appeared in may be our only indication of how old it is. We still cite the 14th edition in a couple dozen articles, so our readers can see that the data is getting old.
The articles in the categories linked above are over 90% of the job. There are probably also articles that do not currently cite Ethnologue, but which we might want to update with the 18th edition. I'll need to generate another category to capture those, probably after most of the Ethnologue 17 citations are taken care of.
Jump in at the WP:LANG talk page if you have any comments or concerns. Thanks for any help you can give!