User talk:Suryavanshikshtriyapage

This is Suryavanshikshtriyapage's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: ORIGIN OF BISEN (June 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Fancy Refrigerator was:

The submission appears to be written in Hindi. This is the English language Wikipedia; we can only accept articles written in the English language. Please provide a high-quality English language translation of your submission. Otherwise, you may write it in the Hindi Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:ORIGIN OF BISEN and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fancy Refrigerator ^(talk) 05:32, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Suryavanshikshtriyapage! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Fancy Refrigerator ^(talk) 05:32, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023

Hello, I'm Prodraxis. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Seuna (Yadava) dynasty, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Prodraxis {talk • contributions} (she/her) 03:53, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Rajput Mughal marriage alliances, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Renewal6 (talk) 13:14, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:ORIGIN OF BISEN

Hello, Suryavanshikshtriyapage. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:ORIGIN OF BISEN, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:05, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

Hello, I'm HMSLavender. I noticed that you recently removed content from Chinese philosophy without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. lavender|^{(formerly HMSSolent)}|lambast 03:37, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Chinese philosophy, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. lavender|^{(formerly HMSSolent)}|lambast 03:39, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Chinese philosophy, you may be blocked from editing. lavender|^{(formerly HMSSolent)}|lambast 03:45, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fake editing

Fake Suryavanshikshtriyapage (talk) 03:44, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Chinese philosophy. Philipnelson99 (talk) 03:46, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:56, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]