User talk:Svsaikumar189

May 2023[edit]

Hello, I'm Arjayay. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to 2.0 (film) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. - Arjayay (talk) 18:56, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to 2.0 (film), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 19:00, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.indiatoday.in/movies/story/here-s-the-real-budget-of-rajinikanth-s-2-0-1376123-2018-10-26 Svsaikumar189 (talk) 01:38, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Project K (film), you may be blocked from editing. - Arjayay (talk) 19:00, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have uploaded a fan made poster on ProjectK page change it. Svsaikumar189 (talk) 01:23, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at List of most expensive Indian films. - Arjayay (talk) 19:02, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

RRR is the most expensive Indian film at present Svsaikumar189 (talk) 01:27, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Adipurush. — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 17:24, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023[edit]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Project K (film), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. SP013 (talk) 17:31, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ANI[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Din oz1 (chat?) (he/him) 15:54, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #75542[edit]

is closed. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:51, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Svsaikumar189 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, I completely understood why I'm blocked. I only wanted to edit some wrong information on movie articles.As I'm new to wikipedia I caused some damage but my intention was never wrong.I want readers to get genuine information but I'm feeling helpless now reading articles with wrong information.Iam apologizing for all my previous mistakes. Please give me one last chance.I will definitely improve my editing and I'll give my best contribution to Wikipedia. In case you find out I made a little mistake it's not hard for you to block me again.Thank you.

Decline reason:

This does not address your Confirmed sockpuppetry. Yamla (talk) 20:15, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I'll note, as well, you attempted to mislead us about your abuse of multiple accounts over at User talk:Subb198. --Yamla (talk) 20:15, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]