User talk:Szacik

This user is a student editor in New_England_College/Global_Issues_(Spring_2018) .

Welcome

Hello, Szacik, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of contents / Department directory

The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)

Need help?

Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The or button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

Szacik, good luck, and have fun. — JJMC89 (T·C) 21:14, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Szacik, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Shalor and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.

Handouts
Choosing an article to edit Editing an article • Add images to articles Citing sources on Wikipedia
Additional Resources
You can find answers to many student questions on our Q&A site, ask.wikiedu.org

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 14:35, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Szacik! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

--

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Mosterbur (talk) 02:09, 8 February 2018 (UTC)Mosterbur[reply]

Make a friend :)

Hey Megan, I'm very glad to make your acquaintance :)

Katie:)

Neutrality My definition of neutrality is similar to that of 'neutral'. It is having the absence of strong views to eliminate biases. New Definition- Presenting a neutral stance to eliminate biases to preserve personal opinion and interpretation. Evaluating Sources How do we define 'good' sources? We commonly define a good source by the credentials/ sources stated in the cite. Whether it is a book, journal, magazine or website. Primary sources are safe, like government issued facts. Secondary sources such as scholarly sources are also credible. These are peer reviewed within the exert community. What types of sources should be Excluded from Wikipedia? Fake news should be excluded. Sources that don't seem credible. One in which seems "spotty" or the odd source that doesn't match up with the topic and related source. This will lead to many misconceptions and wrong facts in public opinion; also creating biases. Authorship How might this change the content of Wikipedia? Wiki ED foundation partnerships have the possibility of changing the content of Wikipedia because of censorship within the potential authors. They control who edits the pages.

Neutrality and Authorship

Neutrality My definition of neutrality is similar to that of 'neutral'. It is having the absence of strong views to eliminate biases. New Definition- Presenting a neutral stance to eliminate biases to preserve personal opinion and interpretation. Evaluating Sources How do we define 'good' sources? We commonly define a good source by the credentials/ sources stated in the cite. Whether it is a book, journal, magazine or website. Primary sources are safe, like government issued facts. Secondary sources such as scholarly sources are also credible. These are peer reviewed within the exert community. What types of sources should be Excluded from Wikipedia? Fake news should be excluded. Sources that don't seem credible. One in which seems "spotty" or the odd source that doesn't match up with the topic and related source. This will lead to many misconceptions and wrong facts in public opinion; also creating biases. Authorship How might this change the content of Wikipedia? Wiki ED foundation partnerships have the possibility of changing the content of Wikipedia because of censorship within the potential authors. They control who edits the pages.

Peer review

Hello Meghan! Its your partner Krissie Borrero. I see that your topic is National agency for education(Sweden). I have read the page and its very short so there are so many options for you on what you can add. Maybe start by going back to who created it and where the ideas came from. Hope to hear some feed back from you soon! Krissieb (talk) 19:22, 19 March 2018 (UTC)krissieb[reply]