User talk:TP Chan

This is TP Chan's talk page. Please leave all messages below this text. Thank you :)

TP Chan, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi TP Chan! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like ChamithN (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

December 2016[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Iain Duncan Smith, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. I've noticed that on Duncan Smith's article you've added links to disambiguation pages instead of specific articles. Please note that if referring to the politician George Robertson, the former Defence secretary born 1946, the markup [[George Robertson]] is not the same as the piped link [[George Robertson, Baron Robertson of Port Ellen|George Robertson]] Iambic Pentameter (talk) 17:07, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Appeals[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. 5 albert square (talk) 20:19, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TP Chan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, administrators, this is TP Chan. I apologise for image changes if you felt that the edits were inappropriate, but I cannot understand why did you guys block me because I made same edits as a user who made some sockpuppet accounts. I feel very disrespected about that. If I make edit based on true information, you guys just block me because of the sockpuppetry made by another person. I am just a normal user like anybody else. I am not a sockpuppet of anyone. Please unblock me, so I can make good edits based on true information. Thank you.

Decline reason:

You are blocked, and are not allowed to edit using any other or alternative account. I am frankly amazed that you have failed to understand this. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 12:07, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TP Chan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, Anthony, this is TP Chan once again. I will let you know once again. I am not a sockpuppet of another user. I am just myself! I do not understand why are you continuously suspecting me as a sockpuppet of a user? I feel very disrespected on your action. You are blocking an innocent user from inserting new information which is true! Please unblock me, so I can make those appropriate edits based on the truth. - TP Chan

Decline reason:

Given the overlap in your editing and some key stylistic characteristics, I have no doubt that you and User:ThomasPark02 are indeed the same person. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:49, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Boing! said Zebedee: Yes; as you will have realized I was aware of the matters which you point out. Obviously I will not elaborate. @TP Chan: you will gain nothing by repeated denial of the obvious. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 17:29, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, beans and all that. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:47, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]