User talk:Tarun45

Jarnail Singh Bhindranwale

Sorry about the revert. I made a mistake when I was looking at the revert, and I thought you were adding those weasel words, but you were in fact removing them. Thanks, and sorry. Nishkid64 (talk) 17:40, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Nanakshahi calendar has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Nanakshahi calendar was changed by Tarun45 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.85473 on 2018-01-02T21:21:11+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:21, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

sikhitothemax.org

Hi, it looks like you are spamming links to www.sikhitothemax.org. Can you please stop adding it to umpteen articles. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 14:38, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

STTM is a relevant resource for all those articles and it's a shame that you would remove that w/o verifying

We already have other links in those articles to translations etc. We do not need more. I am reverting your reverts of me. Please take note of the information below. - Sitush (talk) 05:09, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

you fail to realize that there are multiple spelling errors in the links that currently exist, the work from sttm is actually vetted by multiple reviewers and is open source - just search github for it

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have recently shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

February 2019

Your recent editing history at Tav-Prasad Savaiye shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

You're still linkspamming at the above and numerous related articles. Please read WP:EL (we don't need duplicated information in external links) and WP:COI. Sitush (talk) 08:57, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have now removed all external links at the following articles. You can go to their talk pages and gain consensus for which link to use.

Akal Ustat - discussion at Talk:Akal Ustat

Japji Sahib - discussion at Talk:Japji Sahib

Anand Sahib - discussion at Talk:Anand Sahib

Jaap Sahib - discussion at Talk:Jaap Sahib

Dasam Granth - discussion at Talk:Dasam Granth

Sabad Patshahi 10 - discussion at Talk:Sabad Patshahi 10

Tav-Prasad Savaiye - discussion at Talk:Tav-Prasad Savaiye

I am utterly fed up of the spamming that goes on at Sikh-related articles and it needs to stop. If anyone complains about my mass removal, I will blame you for triggering it. - Sitush (talk) 09:29, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]