User talk:Tawker/archive2
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Tawker. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Boggle 99
The article (right now) is Boggle's verion plus your university edit. I would like to revert it back to [1], but I've already got 3 reverts on there today. I agree, the rule is no big deal, but I need to find some way to convince him to stop the revert war! I think his version makes the article one-sided, not to mention violates the writing policy here... --Colle||Talk-- 08:24, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
- I filled out the 3RR notice,[2] hopefully he doesn't think I'm trying to be a jerk... I got blocked for the same thing the other day! --Colle||Talk-- 08:28, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
Comments
Thanks for the discipline on user Pqpq regarding the blanking of my user page. Your intervention was appreciated. Author782 08:51, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
Semi-automated template substitution?
You added a message to my talk page saying something on it was subst:'ed; however, I cannot find any other change to the page. What happened? --cesarb 17:11, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
Thanks
Thank you for reverting 134.58.253.114's replacement of my talk page. Propz to you. Copysan 22:39, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
gracias!
Hey fella. Thanks for the vandalism revert on my userpage :) Adrian~enwiki (talk) 22:53, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
Please don't clutter
Thank you for pointing out that you replaced a template with text, but don't post an extra message just because of it. It's just mildly annoying clutter.
Peter Isotalo 23:27, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
Substing templates
Hi Tawker,
Just curious, shouldn't a bot have the job what you're doing right now? --Khoikhoi 00:48, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
- Lol, thanks for your reply. ;) --Khoikhoi 00:57, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
- Hehe, so much for your exercise. --Khoikhoi 02:35, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
hi, what's the meaning of the scrap about semiautomatic templates you left on my user talk page? Xah Lee 04:38, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
Thanks
Thank you for reverting Pqpq's blanking of my userbox page. I tell you, I take a wikibreak over the weekend and people get up to all kinds of mischef!
Cheers
Blarneytherinosaur 04:56, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
Barnstar
I award you with a Working Man's Barnstar for your amazing work on reverting vandalism and substituting templates. Congratulations! -- WB 08:04, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
Reply
It's not semi-protected. I don't know why Dyalko added that tag. --Khoikhoi 00:45, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
Valentines thanks
Thanks for the Valentines Day message; you too. :) --AySz88^-^ 04:42, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks for the message. You too. -- WB 05:03, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
- Valentines welcome. :) --a.n.o.n.y.m t 05:47, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
multiple edits
Thanks for the feedback. I am still learning. I will do what I can to consolidate edits here. I have been having problems with wikis server tonight and was afraid of losing edits. I am also a beginner here on WIKI so I do get much to busy sometimes. I see your point however I support it and I will be more patient. 128.111.95.240 07:39, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
test 4
Thanks for removing test 4 from my talk page. I have no idea why Okaaj left a test4 warning template for me. --Aminz 09:13, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
Semi-automated template substitution
Oh okay. Seeing the templates removed by an anonymous user, I assumed it was vandalism. Thanks. BTW, why did you use an IP address? Bcem2 00:04, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
Why in the world would I call you Honey?
Arent you a guy? Im not sure That I know exactly what in the fuck it is your referring to. pickelbarrel 01:49, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
- I should also remind you that Jimbo does NOT like userboxes...just so you knowpickelbarrel 01:51, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
I was referring to
the calling you honey part, but I will tell you what, I sure didnt realize 'fuck' was NOT allowed on userpages. Sorry 'bout that...can you show me where the policy is that states the word that arent allowed, so as I can be sure not to use them anymore...Im still abit of a newbie thanks pickelbarrel 01:59, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
- I should say that I have used the word when writine to Administrator UncleG , Wangi , And even Jimbo himself, and they had failed to tell me of such a policy...this is all new to me. pickelbarrel 02:02, 15 February 2006 (UTC)