User talk:Techno-Freak

May 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Allwinner Technology has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Allwinner Technology was changed by Դավիթ4 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.899756 on 2017-05-29T10:29:16+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:29, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. HistoryofIran (talk) 11:05, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Antiochus I of Commagene, you may be blocked from editing. Drmies (talk) 01:39, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What are your sources stating that the Commagene was a Greco-Iranian kingdom? I provided you with two sources and have you managed to read the whole book in a minute and say it is not enough? Check the sources again do research and try to threaten me with blocking I can report you and have blocked. Another fact and direction for you to explore, the Commagene was run by the Orontid dynasty which was the Armenian dynasty. Techno-Freak (talk) Techno-Freak (talk) 02:09, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Are you serious? OK. First of all, you can report me, but I can block you. Second, there's this at the end of the sentence you modified: {{harvnb|Canepa|2010|p=13}}; {{harvnb|Garsoian|2005}}; {{harvnb|Erskine|Llewellyn-Jones|Wallace|2017|p=75}}; {{harvnb|Canepa|2015|p=80}}; {{harvnb|Sartre|2005|p=23}}; {{harvnb|Widengren|1986|pp=135–136}}; {{harvnb|Merz|Tieleman|2012|p=68}}; {{harvnb|Ball|2002|p=436}}; {{harvnb|Shayegan|2016|pp=8, 13}}; {{harvnb|Strootman|2020|p=205}}; {{harvnb|Facella|2021}}; {{harvnb|Michels|2021|p=485}}; {{harvnb|Toumanoff|1963|p=278}}; {{harvnb|Gaggero|2016|p=79}}; {{harvnb|Allsen|2011|p=37}}; {{harvnb|Olbrycht|2021|p=38}}; {{harvnb|Drower|Grey|Sherwin-White|Wiesehöfer|2021}}; {{harvnb|Ferguson|2021|p=170}}; {{harvnb|Boyce|Grenet|1991|p=309}}; {{harnvb|Vlassopoulos|2013|p=312}}; {{harnvb|Crone|2012|p=351}}; {{harvnb|Graf|2019|p=III}}; {{harvnb|Jacobs|Rollinger|2021|p=1660}}; {{harvnb|Russell|1986|pp=438–444}}; {{harnvb|Spawforth|2016}}; {{harnvb|Sherwin-White|Kuhrt|1993|p=193}}; {{harvnb|Campbell|2015|p=27}}. I am assuming, and that's how Wikipedia works, that those verify "Greco-Iranian" or versions thereof. Go click on them. Finally, I did in fact look at your (improperly formatted) links. This, and I'll be charitable, is where you are attempting to verify by way of linking to a book, but you're linking to a catalog entry for a book, and the entry doesn't even mention the word "Armenian", in English or in German, and on top of that the book is a travel book/atlas from 1890, and thus hardly an up to date or comprehensive source. Your other bare URL links to the "Roman and Roman-friendly Women Writers Bibliography", which has of course nothing at all to do with the subject. I mean, seriously. Bringing a bibliography of women writers to a discussion on the origin of a 2000-year old kingdom is just silly. In the first instance you confused a catalog entry with a book, in the second you confused a bibliography with books. Drmies (talk) 14:33, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. As before: your sources are woefully inadequate, for reasons given earlier--the "texts" you cite don't even contain the words you claim they do. Drmies (talk) 23:02, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You are dome as hell, it is a book about that kingdom read the book and you will find out the truth. The title of the book can not and should not include everything that is discussed in the book, lol. Techno-Freak (talk) 01:56, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Btw, I do not see the source to give really reliable information about the kingdom being Greco-Iranian. The kingdom was Armeno-(Greco)Grecian. Techno-Freak (talk) 01:57, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Additionally, for your reference the reliable source are not only English sources. Techno-Freak (talk) 01:59, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I'm "dome as hell"? Haha, that's funny. Anyway, I'm just going to point out how troubling your comments are, in case the next admin is trying to decide on a block per WP:CIR. Your edit did not link "the book". It linked this and this--so for starters that's two things. The first, and now I am doubting that you actually know and understand this, is a page for a catalog entry containing a link to a digital copy of an atlas from 1890. It's a wonderful book, with photographs and drawings, but it does not contain text, and certainly no text that identified Commagene as an Armenian kingdom. If you're so sure, why don't you point at a page? And the second link is not to a book but to a bibliography, published on a website that allows things that are not peer reviewed; there is no indication that this bibliography was ever published--but all of that is irrelevant, because a mere list of titles could never prove that Commagene was an Armenian kingdom.

Now you keep complaining about the sourcing for Commagene, but that is vacuous. You edited that, were reverted by Kansas Bear, and never sought the talk page to argue that point. Why not? Because that is your only way here: if you keep editing either Antiochus I of Commagene or Commagene in this way, you will end up blocked. Drmies (talk) 15:13, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Drmies: Hello. Unfortunately Techno-Freak have already resumed doing that, this time claiming that 27 citations aren't "enough" [1]. --HistoryofIran (talk) 11:25, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 16:31, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]