User talk:Temperatehorse

April 2024[edit]

Hello, Temperatehorse, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 11:39, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I see you tagged me in a post on Mr. Adams page. I do not personally know him. I have read his book as have some friends of mine, and so I thought his position noteworthy Temperatehorse (talk) 16:49, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 01:31, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Temperatehorse (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This account is not a Sockpuppet. I don't understand why it was blocked for being one. The "guide to appealing blocks page referenced that accounts are blocked as sockpuppets when they are from use the same IP address as a blocked account. I can't imagine my account meets that criteria. Is there a way to check?Temperatehorse (talk) 02:28, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

There is not a way to check available. The block is based on behavior, as you made the exact same edit as a blocked user. It is possible that this is meat puppetry and not sock puppetry, but if so you will need to explain why you made the same edits as a blocked user. 331dot (talk) 07:43, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Temperatehorse (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have read aryeh Kaplan's and Ben Adam's books and their viewpoints are interesting and certainly notable given the fact that they both espouse orthodox views and yet believe cannabis, as a hallucinogen has religious or spiritual value. I think that is a well supported view in academic scholarship - i am happy to provide further sources - which makes their viewpoint notable. I have no association with either author. It seems unlikely to me that my edits were identical to something someone posted prior, although perhaps it was similar if the prior post was also attempting to synopsise their thesis. For these reasons, Please consider removing the block. Thank youTemperatehorse (talk) 14:13, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Upon review of the behavioural and technical evidence, I find it exceedingly likely that you are either Badambook or someone so close to them as to be indistinguishable from them. Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:16, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.