Jump to content

User talk:Tescotime

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tescotime (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

apparently i got blocked for me having a name of a UK supermarket but i dont even know that the shop was a thing Tescotime (talk) 15:53, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You have not picked a new username. Nor have you addressed the perceived violation of WP:SOCK. Yamla (talk) 15:55, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 Renamer note: - No rename can be done until the violation of WP:SOCK has been resolved. --SimmeD (talk) 10:16, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tescotime (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

that glass of milk dude which you're calling my sock is a friend of mine and the incident that occurred that caused my account to get banned happened years ago so i dont remember exactly what me and him did and why you think its me. Tescotime (talk) 21:43, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

See WP:MEAT. We don't know who is sitting at the computer operating an account, so when you appear to be the same as another account, we must assume that you are. 331dot (talk) 08:57, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tescotime (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Well I don't know what you want me to say or what will convince me that i'm not him. i just wanna edit some pages about cookie clicker man can you just let me off lmao Tescotime (talk) 21:05, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

While I agree with you that your username should not have been any part of the basis for the block as there's no evidence you were editing in any way to promote Tesco, the other part of the basis is a different issue entirely. You don't know what you can say? Neither do we, if you come down to asking that, and frankly "what will convince me that i'm not him" can too easily be read as a revealing Freudian slip. — Daniel Case (talk) 07:48, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tescotime (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

So what happens now then? Tescotime (talk) 3:36 pm, 9 November 2020, Monday (9 days ago) (UTC+0)

Decline reason:

It is quite possible that GlassOfMiiilk is a friend of yours, and that your sandbox edits two years ago were just you two fooling around with Wikipedia. However, that your fooling around contained phrases such as "2 men had sex in it but made a dog", "yeah raped by haha shibe", and "i hit my mother with a barebqeue cleaner and now shes passed out what do i do police and blame the black neighbour", and "i hate blacks" it appears as though you are not entirely serious about editing an encyclopedia. That your appeal contains phrases such as "man can you just let me off lmao" indicates that you are still approaching Wikipedia in a light hearted manner. If you edit here you will soon get into trouble and have your edits reverted. I suggest you go to The Video Game Wiki, and register as a user, then you can edit the Wiki page on Cookie Clicker. SilkTork (talk) 10:48, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tescotime (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Ok, I'm very sorry for what I did in the past. I didn't realise that I said that kind of stuff, I was dumb back then. Me and my friend were just messing around and we didn't expect the consequences and how serious they would be. To be honest, I really don't want to edit on the Fandom wiki, as I see it as less professional, so it would mean a lot if I was able to edit on the official Wikipedia. Once again, sorry for my actions, I'll never do it again, and i hope you consider unbanning me. ====

Decline reason:

I'd like you to prove that you can make constructive edits to Wikipedia. You can see that in this edit I did some work on I-Opener to bring it into compliance with our core content policies, including citing sources and adding content. Now that you've seen an example of a constructive edit, can you give us an example of what you'd do to help Wikipedia? It could be as simple as suggesting a fact that could be included in an article about your favorite video game or film, backed up with a citation to a reliable source. You can immediately make another unblock request with your response. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 14:50, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tescotime (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Seeing your edit, i have now realised how to make constructive edits, and to help wiki, i will try to keep pages that have not been changed in a while up to date, as well as adding citations and references to things that shouldve had them in the first place. one example of an edit i would consider is updating the cookie clicker page, by expanding on the creators of the game, such as opti, as no info is shown on the page about them. Tescotime (talk) 23:26, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only; the request would seem to be not persuasive enough for an uninvolved administrator to act upon. You may make another request. 331dot (talk) 20:43, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tescotime (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Ok. An edit i will make if i was unbanned will be cleaning up certain pages, for example i recently found the page for the common starling, which has some template errors and other issues. if i was unbanned, i would clear these mistakes up.

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only; please do as suggested below. 331dot (talk) 08:50, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

That's unspecific. Post an actual edit here on your talk page. Not some generic "I would do something useful". Include an encyclopedic statement and a citation to a reliable source. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 22:04, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand what else I can do.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Tescotime (talkcontribs)

You may use the process I posted below to suggest a researched, significant edit to an article. If there are no such edits you wish to make at this time, I would suggest withdrawing your unblock request until such time as there is an edit you wish to make. There is no deadline here, you may take all the time you need. 331dot (talk) 09:52, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This unblock request has been declined due to your history of vandalism and/or disruption to this encyclopedia. However, we are willing to give you another chance provided that you can earn back the trust of the Wikipedia community. To be unblocked you need to demonstrate that you are willing and able to contribute positively to Wikipedia. You can do this by:

  • Familiarizing yourself with our basic rules.
  • Read our guide to improving articles.
  • Pick any pre-existing article you wish to improve.
  • If you have trouble choosing an article to improve, see this index of articles needing improvement for ideas. Once you have decided on the article you will propose improvements to:
    1. Click the Edit tab at the top of that article;
    2. Copy the portion of the prose from that article that you will be proposing changes to. However:
      • do not copy the "infobox" from the start of the article (i.e., markup like this: {{infobox name|...}});
      • do not copy any image placement code (i.e., markup like this: [[File:Name.jpg|thumb|caption]]);
      • do not copy the page's categories from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: [[Category:Name]]);
      • do not copy the stub tag (if there) from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: {{Foo stub}});
    3. Click edit at your talk page, and paste at the bottom under a new section header (like this: == [[Article title]] ==) the copied content but do not save yet;
    4. Place your cursor in the edit summary box and paste there an edit summary in the following form which specifies the name of the article you copied from and links to it (this is required for mandatory copyright attribution): "Copied content from [[exact Name of Article]]; see that article's history for attribution."
    5. You can now save the page. However, if your edits will include citations to reliable sources (which they should), add the following template to the end of your prose: {{reflist-talk}}. Once you have added the template, click Publish changes.
  • Now, edit that content. Propose significant and well researched improvements by editing the selected portion of the article. Please note that we are not looking for basic typo corrections, or small unreferenced additions; your edits should be substantial, and reflect relevant policies.
  • When you are done with your work, re-request unblocking and an administrator will review your proposed edits.
    • If we (including the original blocking admin) are convinced that your proposed edits will improve Wikipedia as an encyclopedia, you will be unblocked.

If you need help while working with your proposed edits, you may add "{{Help me|your question here ~~~~}}" to your talk page. Thank you. 331dot (talk)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tescotime (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I don't understand what pages I can edit and what changes I can make. Im sorry if im not understanding this, but the page you linked, i cant find any links to any other pages that need help. Tescotime (talk) 09:49, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Not an unblock request. To just ask a question, put {{help me}} instead of an unblock request. To respond, you may edit any article of your choosing that you wish to make a substantive, well researched edit to(not just fixing grammar or spelling, or any other minor change). If you follow the instructions provided, you can demonstrate that edit here on this page. 331dot (talk) 16:09, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.