User talk:TheXFactorSeries7

Welcome

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Hello, TheXFactorSeries7, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Please sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

We're so glad you're here! — GypsyJiver (drop me a line) 15:50, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The X Factor (UK), (Series 7)

This is an automated message from VWBot. I have performed a search with the contents of The X Factor (UK), (Series 7), and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: The X Factor (UK series 7). It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. VWBot (talk) 18:14, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

December 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to The X Factor (UK series 6), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Anemone Projectors 18:37, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The X Factor (UK series 6). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Anemone Projectors 18:39, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Miley Stewart has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. --Gnowor^T_C 21:23, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Fair City constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to remove content without explanation. Thank you. --Gnowor^T_C 21:33, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Treyc Cohen (singer)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Treyc Cohen (singer) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. I42 (talk) 16:51, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

December 2010

Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow or move it unilaterally against naming conventions or consensus, as you did to Hannah Montana (season 4). This includes making page moves while a discussion remains under way. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Thank you. AussieLegend (talk) 17:34, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to List of EastEnders characters. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. I42 (talk) 17:42, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to List of EastEnders characters. Piast 93 17:45, 18 December 2010 (UTC) REPLY: I'm very sorry.[reply]

Nomination of Scoil Ide, Clondalkin for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Scoil Ide, Clondalkin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scoil Ide, Clondalkin until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Epeefleche (talk) 05:37, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]