User talk:Theelectricspider39
Theelectricspider39, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]
|
Hi Theelectricspider39! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! I JethroBT (I'm a Teahouse host) This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:20, 4 October 2015 (UTC) |
Disambiguation link notification for November 11
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sunshine duration, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Yuma. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:19, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
Theelectricspider39 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am appealing to be unblocked. The reason given is 'block evasion' even though this is my only Wikipedia account. If it was for vandalism, I apologize if that's the case as any malicious edits I may have made were only in good faith. If the block was for another reason, an explanation would be appreciated. Theelectricspider39 (talk) 22:52, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Decline reason:
If you are not evading blocks then you and another editor have a truly remarkable degree of similarity in your approach. However, whether you are evading blocks or not, your editing is unhelpful and disruptive, and unblocking you would not be beneficial to the project. (Incidentally, I am bewildered as to how anyone can do anything "malicious" and at the same time "in good faith".) The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 12:16, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
@Tide rolls:- what account or IP block is this user evading? PhilKnight (talk) 23:42, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 11
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sunshine duration, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Yuma. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:19, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
Theelectricspider39 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am appealing to be unblocked. The reason given is 'block evasion' even though this is my only Wikipedia account. If it was for vandalism, I apologize if that's the case as any malicious edits I may have made were only in good faith. If the block was for another reason, an explanation would be appreciated. Theelectricspider39 (talk) 22:52, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Decline reason:
If you are not evading blocks then you and another editor have a truly remarkable degree of similarity in your approach. However, whether you are evading blocks or not, your editing is unhelpful and disruptive, and unblocking you would not be beneficial to the project. (Incidentally, I am bewildered as to how anyone can do anything "malicious" and at the same time "in good faith".) The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 12:16, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
@Tide rolls:- what account or IP block is this user evading? PhilKnight (talk) 23:42, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Phil, it's my assessment that this individual is a reincarnation of Weathereditor (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). As always I am open to outside viewpoints. Apologies for wiping out your inquiry with my post. Purely a technical matter. Tiderolls 12:51, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
Theelectricspider39 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Here's my second appeal to be unblocked. I sincerely apologize for the unhelpful and disruptive edits, and I fully understand why they were disruptive. I will not repeat this behaviour again. Also, I'm not Weathereditor. Theelectricspider39 (talk) 20:09, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Edit patterns coupled with timing of this account is enough for WP:DUCK sockpuppetry block. OhNoitsJamie Talk 20:23, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
This user is not a sockpuppet of Weathereditor, it should be unblocked immediately2A02:C7F:C802:4000:1CD7:1B96:931:EBB3 (talk) 19:49, 24 July 2016 (UTC)