User talk:Thiseye

This user may have left Wikipedia. Thiseye has not edited Wikipedia since June 2015. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Thiseye, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! --ZeWrestler ^Talk 14:01, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Taj typos

I created most of those typos~thanks for fixing them!! --Nemonoman 06:03, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Hinduism

There is a project here on Wikipedia to imrpove Hinduism-related articles. You may wish to join. DaGizza^Chat ^© 12:12, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pleuger rudder

Thank you for spellchecking this article. Please do not simply change the spelling from British English to American English. I am going to leave the edit in place because it's not relevant, but it just seems such a waste of time, and is also not in accord with wkipedia's guidelines on spellings. There is a whole revert war at Aluminium because of spelling differences. Fiddle Faddle 06:54, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

After a couple of such changes, I quickly realized that 'manoeuverability' was an acceptable spelling in British English even though it is listed here as a misspelling. I removed the correction setting in my AWB. But thanks for your post. Thiseye 07:01, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- There are a number of dipthongs which will catch AWB out. These things are always a challenge. It should not be listed in that article though. Fiddle Faddle 07:07, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your AWB "fixes"...

Hi. Thanks for your efforts using AWB.

You seem to have changed the order of inter-language links at Eurovision Song Contest. See the diff here. I was told that these links should be in alphabetical order.. but it seems that you are moving them out of order. Why? What is correct? EuroSong ^talk 08:11, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I did notice that oddity in AWB once when I was using it today. I assumed the links were to be in alphabetical order as well based on how the AWB normally operates. When I saw that today, I assumed there was some kind of exception, but I realize now that that was probably a dumb assumption to make. Perhaps, I had some setting incorrect or AWB just got confused. Thanks for bringing it to my attention though. I'll double-check my settings and be more careful in the future. Thiseye 08:29, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

- AWB is not confused, the order is correct and specified at http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Interwiki_sorting_order and is the same order used by all bots. Martin 22:34, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please update

Please update to the latest version of AWB, it now includes all my spelling fixes and is actively developed by the community. Thanks. --mboverload @ 03:39, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AWB question

Hi Thiseye.

Today your AWB robot changed the code for Ø (Ø) to the letter Ø. Can everybody then read the letter now?

On my office computer, Chinese 'letters' are just small squares and sanskrit are vertical lines. Does the Scandinavian letters Æ, Ø and Å show up on your screen? (Æ, Ø and Å)

(I'm not interested in directions in getting my browser to read Chinese letters) --Necessary Evil 07:00, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand what you're asking --Thiseye 03:05, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

- Why is your AWB robot changing Ø to the letter Ø? I asked you if all computers in the World are set up to read Ø ? Necessary Evil 14:00, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

- - Not necessarily, but then Ø means absolutely nothing to anyone at all, at least the unicode makes sense to most people. Martin 22:34, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

- - - Welcome Martin to the discussion.
    - People will not see: Ø on their monitors, they will see Ø. My question is; will more people see Ø from Ø than the typed Ø ? Please DO NOT read this in the Editing box or in the Show Changes box. If you do, it will make no sense at all! Bye Necessary Evil 12:06, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Grammar issue

I noticed that you listed yourself as a grammar nazi. I actually have a grammar issue that I thought you might be willing to help with. It is regarding whether or not dances (like waltz, tango, swing, ballet, etc.) should be capitalized. There is currently a discussion about it at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Dance and Talk:Lindy Hop. We would certainly appreciate your input. Thanks! —Cswrye 14:28, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Project Ski

You have been invited to become a member of WikiProject Ski, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to skiing, athletes, companies and mountains on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.

AWB edit to Penrhyn Quarry Railway

Hi Thiseye. I noticed that you recently made a change to the Penrhyn Quarry Railway article with AWB, changing occurrences of frac12; to ½. I think its a mistake to do this for a couple of reasons. First, at least on my machine frac12; (which produces ½) is slightly easier to read than ½ because it renders the nominator and denominator of the fraction in a larger font. Second, its much easier for people to correct a fraction written using the frac template; on some systems it is very hard to type the ½ character and there aren't Unicode characters for all the appropriate fractions, whereas the frac template can produce any arbitrary fraction.

I couldn't find any policy or guideline that suggests the Unicode characters such as ½ are preferred and I believe there are significant advantages to using the frac template. Could I ask you not to replace the frac template in the future, or at least point me to the guideline that says it should be replaced?

Thanks, Gwernol 23:26, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pages needing correction

Hello Thiseye, I noticed your intervention on the Intelligence Support Activity page. I had begun to improve the page because noone seemed to want to do it, but I don't speak english well enough, thank you for your correction of my mistakes. I have also added some text on other pages, including Joint Special Operations Command, Joint Communications Unit and 24th Special Tactics Squadron. Could you please check it and correct the mistakes I have probably done ? Thank you. Rob1bureau 21:54, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Incidentally, I didn't find too many errors --Thiseye 02:26, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. But I have not written much text in these pages, on the contrary of the Intelligence Support Activity. Rob1bureau 12:49, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Do you actually enjoy correcting? If you do, you are a gold mine! :Dc76 19:49, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I do actually. I'm weird like that. :-) --Thiseye 03:23, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AutoWikiBrowser

Hi Thiseye,

AutoWikiBrowser's Google Search function is working again. You have to download the latest version, but it's working. Just thought I'd let you know. :) Happy editing, Firsfron of Ronchester 01:32, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Apprentice UK

Hello, Thiseye and thank you for your contributions on articles related to The Apprentice UK. I'd like to invite you to become a part of WikiProject The Apprentice UK, a WikiProject aiming to improve coverage of The Apprentice UK and related articles on Wikipedia.

If you would like to help out and participate, please come over and visit us here for more information. Thanks! Dalejenkins 11:14, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hehe

thanks for correcting the language errors, I seem to write 'eachother' a lot ;) --P e lotas^talk 17:53, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for correcting the spelling errors on my translated article, Camille Sée

Wikipedia:Peer review/Shahbag/archive2

I have just put the article to peer review. Would you care to take a look? Aditya Kabir 20:09, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I made some typos fixes. --Thiseye 04:41, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Soviet invasion of Poland (1939)

If you have some time (and interest), could you please look at this article and correct it for grammar and style. It is being considered for FA. Don't shy to say if you notice some problems with it. Actually, judge it at a higher standard than ordinary articles (it is considered for FA), i.e. don't think "this way is not wrong", but think "this way is not wrong, but there is a better way". Thank you. :Dc76 22:24, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Hi, I've been scratching my head trying to figure out why you added Benjamin Ward Richardson to Category:People from Evansville, Indiana. There's no indication he ever even visited the place. Cgingold (talk) 10:43, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think I can throw a little light on this. At 13:54 on 23 April 2007 a vandal called Kimberlyneese changed Richardson's birthplace to Evansville, Indiana as well as some other rubbish. This all remained unnoticed until 30 May 2007 when thiseye changed the category, not realising that it was vandalism. On 30 October 2007 ^demon corrected the most glaring vandalism, including the birthplace, but not using undo, since there had been good faith edits in between. On 28 February Beeblbrox corrected a bit more. Then on 3 April 2008 I (SamuelTheGhost) corrected the remaining vandalism in the article, but didn't notice the category problem. Then finally Cgingold put that right on 13 July 2008. Luckily Kimberlyneese seems to have ceased to edit wikipedia, and is, one hopes, dead, but it shows how careful it is necessary to be, especially when using bots. SamuelTheGhost (talk) 17:13, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism on Parrotfish

Thanks for pointing that out - I reverted one unconstructive edit without seeing the ones before it. In the future, one way to fix a situation like that (where there are no substantive edits after the vandalism) is: 1) go to the last good version using page history, 2) click "edit", 3) click "save page" without making any other edits. Or turn on Twinkle, which will allow you to use rollback. Hanacy (talk) 09:26, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Revision to Sid Meier's Alien Crossfire and Sid Meier's Alpha Centauri articles

I noticed that you have revised either Sid Meier's Alpha Centauri or Sid Meier's Alien Crossfire.

I intend to revise those articles following the Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Article guidelines. There are more details on the discussion pages of those articles. I'd be interested in any comments you have. It would be best if your comments were on the discussion pages of the two articles.

Thank you.

Vyeh (talk) 10:35, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Campus Ambassadors wanted at LSU

Hi! I'm leaving you this message because you indicated an association with Louisiana State University. The Wikipedia Ambassador Program is currently looking for Campus Ambassadors to help with Wikipedia assignments at LSU, which will be participating in the Public Policy Initiative for the Spring 2011 semester. The role of Campus Ambassadors will be to provide face-to-face training and support for students on Wikipedia-related skills (how to edit articles, how to add references, etc.). This includes doing in-class presentations, running workshops and labs, possibly holding office hours, and in general providing in-person mentorship for students.

Prior Wikipedia skills are not required for the role, as training will be provided for all Campus Ambassadors (although, of course, being an experienced editor is a plus).

If you live near Baton Rouge and you are interested in being a Wikipedia Campus Ambassador, or know someone else from the area who might be, please email me or leave a message on my talk page.--Sage Ross - Online Facilitator, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 17:05, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mississippi Fire Dogs

The article Mississippi Fire Dogs has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for reference found lots or Wikipedia mirrors, but no independent WP:RS to support this article, fails WP:V and WP:V

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:25, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Colorado

WikiProject
Colorado

United States
notice board

The year 2011 has brought many changes to the State of Colorado. We have a new Governor and other state officers, two new U.S. Representatives, many new state legislators, and a new Mayor of Denver. WikiProject Colorado is updating many Colorado articles. Many Colorado places, people, and organizations need new articles. Portal:Colorado needs new featured articles.

Can you help us? Please see our list of some requested articles. If you wish, you may join WikiProject Colorado at Wikipedia:WikiProject Colorado/Members. If you have any questions, please leave me a message at User talk:Buaidh or e-mail me at Special:EmailUser/Buaidh. Thanks for any help you can provide.

Don't forget the Wikipedia 10th Anniversary event in Boulder tomorrow. Yours aye, Buaidh 23:08, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion, guidelines for use at WP:MINOR). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and all users will still be able to manually mark their edits as being minor in the usual way.

For well-established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 20:37, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:03, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge

You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here!

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:41, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Possible removal of AWB access due to inactivity

Hello! There is currently a request for approval of a bot to manage the AutoWikiBrowser CheckPage by removing inactive users, among other tasks. You are being contacted because you may qualify as an inactive user of AWB. First, if you have any input on the proposed bot task, please feel free to comment at the BRFA. Should the bot task be approved, your access to AWB may be uncontroversially removed if you do not resume editing within a week's time. This is purely for routine maintenance of the CheckPage, and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You will be able regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:36, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tokyo Joe's

The article Tokyo Joe's has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 11:59, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!