User talk:Tikiwont/Archive 16

Archive 10

←

Archive 14

Archive 15

Archive 16

Archive 17

Archive 18

→

Archive 20

99 North

I am currently considering creating an article titled "99 North (record label)" which would then redirect to Higher State and noticed your work on 99 North in relation to AnimalSense - just wondering whether you think it would be an idea to create a Disambiguation page for them both - your thoughts...? Hudson702 (talk) 12:56, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

No problem. Wouldn't this also refer to some actual highways? --Tikiwont (talk) 12:14, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

At the moment, my main concern is creating the article of one whilst preserving the history of the other - I'm based in the UK so my knowledge of US highways is limited, but I have included a link to Highway. Anyway, I have created the Disambiguation page with the appropriate links - let me know if there are any errors, and many thanks. Hudson702 (talk) 13:03, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

Cunnamulla

Hi. You may be interested in Talk:Cunnamulla, Queensland#Requested move given this earlier edit you made. Cheers, Mattinbgn\^talk 01:47, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

July 2010

When moving pages, as you did to Wylie Draper, please remember to fix any double redirects. These can create slow, unpleasant experiences for the reader, waste server resources, and make the navigational structure of the site confusing. Thank you. elektrikSHOOS 21:31, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

Methal pertiwi

Could I just ask why you deleted and then instantly restored this article? Not complaining, especially seeing as you put it up for AfD. I'm just very curious...Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 20:39, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

Well, I noticed that article had already previously been deleted as prod[1] but was already pushing the button. According to WP:PROD, an article should only be proposed or deleted once as uncontroversially because the recreation counts as objection, so it should be AFD the second time. I noticed this belatedly but you should check that too next time before tagging.--Tikiwont (talk) 07:29, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

Thanks you for letting me know! *curtsies* Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 09:14, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

Deletion of Cyberoam Security certifications

Hello, I appreciate your help in restoring the article Cyberoam Security certifications to my userspace. I will do my best to rectify potential problems and concerns based on wikipedia editing guidelines for notability and neutrality. However, the editor Fastily (talk · contribs) who deleted my article has announced his permanent retirement from wikipedia. That means he will no longer be available to check whatever edits I make. Who do I approach in that event? Can any other wikipedia editors verify my article for inclusion???? What is the re-inclusion procedure for deleted articles? Appreciate any help. --Tech editor007 (talk) 20:00, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

Sorry to hear that! WP:FEEDBACK, but after some work and with good refs as it is usually backlogged..--Tikiwont (talk) 08:34, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

Deletion of Elena Volkova

Hello, Thank's for removing speed deletion tag on Elena Volkova . Now, could you have a look on my last addings :

- a citation of Sergei Tarabarov of the Gallery of Naive Art "Dar" (National Center for Contemporary Art of Moscow (NCCA)

- a reference of an other book : Ксения Богемская "Советское наивное искусство" "The Soviet naïve art" ed.Интерроса ISBN 978-5-91105-018-4 p. 12, 16, 229, 324-325 (you can find a PDF abstract at http://www.knigiwam.ru/images/naiv_iskusstvo/naiv_iskusstvo.pdf , summary p. 382)

- a reference of a permanent exhibition : Collection of Gallery of Naive Art (National Center for Contemporary Art of Moscow (NCCA))

I'm rather new on Wikipedia : as the creator of this page, can I remove myself this deletion tag. it seem's that I can (that was not allowed for speed deletion tag). Is it true ? Of course I would prefer that some one else did it.

Thank you for your help

Qqchose2sucre (talk) 05:37, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

Well, mine was a decision as reviewing admin of the speedy deletion tag, mostly referring to the exhibitions. Now someone else has already removed the tag on your behalf as the deletion would not be uncontroversial. (You could indeed have done it yourself. In case of further doubt, someone might open a deletion discussion. In which case WP:ARTIST would be the yardstick, but more in depth sources might also be helpful / necessary. --Tikiwont (talk) 08:00, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

Penelope Laurie

...is back, and hasn't been deleted yet. Mind having a look? --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 16:16, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

...meanwhile deleted, gave an only warning --Tikiwont (talk) 18:30, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

Location of of Pančić's Peak

You contributed to the Pančić's Peak article on 10 March 2008. Could you take a look at my comment at Talk:Pančić's Peak#Central Serbia or Kosovo. --Bejnar (talk) 21:04, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

Apart form declining the speedy deletion I have no particular knowledge, where the exactly mountain is, but I doubt it can be decided by looking at the Google map.--Tikiwont (talk) 12:53, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

thank

Its just right ,Thanks for all Tikiwont - --Alpha30 (talk) 12:49, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

Re:

Many thanks for the notice :) --Vituzzu (talk) 13:16, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

RE: Speedy deletion converted to PROD: Pop Goes the Weasel (novel)

Cool, actually i thought another tag would do better, but couldnt remember which one.Lihaas (talk) 14:39, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

Feedback - large increase in requests

The graph says it all, really; massive increase since we cleared the backlog and introduced a bit better system. As I've said before, it is a 'victim of its own success', I think. Currently, it is pretty backlogged.

Quite a few get missed, as you can see if you flick through the archives - but I don't know what we can do about that, really, other than hope more people give feedback.

The long-term solution would be to keep these editors; so many come to just create one article, and are never heard of again; if just a few of those stayed, and started giving feedback, then we'd have a more workable system.

I suggest discussion in this WT:FEED section. Cheers!

(I've send this message out to a small number of people that I think/hope will be interested; people who have given feedback, etc. if wrong, apologies, let me know.)

 Chzz  ►  00:05, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

Wilhelm Friedrich Mittrich

Thanks for notifying me about that. I have however removed your prod on the reason that there are multiple reliable sources that cover this person's exploits, so he meets WP:N regardless of any source text for translation. Please see also my comment on your CSD G8 posting. Cheers, De728631 (talk) 16:23, 27 September 2010 (UTC)