User talk:Tim!/Archive fish

Please see Archive 0 for older archived discussions.

Merging schools[edit]

You're a bloody genius.
This was the best and boldest idea to the hit the cesspool of school VfDs in ages. Saves the information (which is what we're about, right?) and contains the bloat. Really brilliant. The VfD was a pretty nasty move, and you took it better than I would have.
So, I hope that the heat is not getting you down. Even if you were wrong (which I don't think you were) all this "the community has decided" is just bluff and bluster. I look forward to seeing what happens next.
Cheers Big Ears!
brenneman ^(t)^(c) 03:00, 9 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. - Have you noticed how much more likely any given talk page is to contain "you idiot" than it is to contain "good job"? Or is that just my talk page?

Edit dispute[edit]

Please do not keep undoing other people's edits without discussing them first. This is considered impolite and unproductive. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert an article to a previous version more than three times in 24 hours. Thank you.62.52.34.208 20:30, 17 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you but I'm pretty sure I know all the wiki policies better than you and posting such long policy as excuse doesn't help much either, unless you could tell me what violets the policy. I'm reverting the change again because I did name the agenda (= goal): increasing tourism and promoting a good picture of Poland. As you can see when looking at the article of propaganda, Mr Polish Plumber is just a normal example of propaganda. Look at the pictures.62.52.34.208 20:46, 17 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

No, a definition is not an opinion. Oh, and yes I can deny what you said: Propaganda reads "Propaganda shares many techniques with advertising. In fact, advertising can be thought of as propaganda that promotes a commercial product; however, the word "propaganda" more typically refers to political or nationalist uses, or promotion of a set of ideas." Therefore the word propaganda is more accurate here. Do not confuse vandalism with violation of the NPOV policy anyhow.62.52.34.208 20:59, 17 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I will keep an eye on the article (i was busy the last days) :)--Witkacy 14:08, 18 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

you may be interested at Propaganda (Neutrality Plumber is the same anon)--Witkacy 12:35, 19 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

you're welcome :)--Witkacy 15:40, 21 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Oops[edit]

...wrong button. Thanks for pointing that out, fixed now. R adiant _>|< 16:39, August 28, 2005 (UTC)

Image:Jeff Rawle.jpg[edit]

Hi. I noticed you tagged this recently uploaded image as fair use, but didn't provide a fair use rationale per Wikipedia:Image description page and Wikipedia:Fair use. Could you please note your justification for this fair use claim on the image description page? Thanks. --Ngb 16:53, 28 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tim. Thanks for doing that -- I think it should suffice. --Ngb 07:30, 29 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Spiral Scratch[edit]

Hi, thanks for the message. I am, of course, glad for any of my work to be tidied up to better fit with what is regarded as properly canon. Jdhowens90 19:36, 4 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Re: List of Primary Route Destinations in Devon[edit]

A primary route destination is a place which is signposted on primary routes (major "A" roads, i.e. those shown in green on most road maps) with green signs. For more information, please see here. Ted Ted 15:47, 5 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Trollderella[edit]

Could you un-indent your last comment? The indentation makes it look like it was addressed to me, while the edit summary makes it look like it was addressed to the other user.

In case it was aimed at me. My comment certainly wasn't meant to be any form of attack, just a statement about my investigation into the user. I have no problem with you pointing out that they were new. I just wanted to present something to balance it out a bit. --GraemeL ^(talk) 19:03, 5 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

thanks Tim. Thought it better to bring it here rather than risk starting more drama on the RfC. --GraemeL ^(talk) 19:10, 5 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Army of Ghosts Reply[edit]

The idea that the Gelth are in the Army of Ghosts is an assumption me and my friends have come up with, and I felt it would be better to have that on the page that nothing at all. JQF 15:48, 7 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Letters Rogatory[edit]

Good job. The two pages certainly should have been merged. I think you did a better job. --SteveHFish 03:03, 10 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

Thanks for welcoming so many new Wikipedians! (And nice unique "Archive 0") :-) --HappyCamper 11:47, 10 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Another Thanks[edit]

Thanks for the welcome, Tim. Tim Watson 12:12, 10 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The Pilot Episode[edit]

Talk: The Pilot Episode — The Pilot Episode → The Pilot Episode (Are You Being Served?) or Pilot episode (Are You Being Served?) or Are You Being Served? pilot episode. --Tony Sidaway^Talk 12:11, 6 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- I would go for Pilot episode (Are You Being Served?) --TimPope 18:09, 6 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Could you make a vote on the appropriate talk page? There has been discussion but nothing conclusive yet. --Tony Sidaway ^Talk 08:03, 14 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Nandesuka's RfA[edit]

I just wanted to drop you a note to thank you for your support on my RfA. I'll try my best to live up to the trust you've shown in me. Thanks, Nandesuka 00:49, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

RTD and Why Don't You?[edit]

To be fair, I don't think it's all that unusual for producers to also act as directors on that type of children's programme, so he almost certainly did both. Angmering 11:18, 18 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fake color articles[edit]

Because of the complexity of the vote at the above AfD, I have attempted to break down the individual votes on the AfD talk page. If I have misunderstood your vote with respect to any of these, please correct it. Cheers! -- BD2412 ^talk 12:55, 18 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]