User talk:Timtrent/Archive 48

Archive 45

Archive 46

Archive 47

Archive 48

Draft xx network

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Xx_network

Hi Timtrent. Thank you for reviewing my xx network article draft. Can you explain to me how articles from important newspaper and media such as Wired, Wall Street Journal, Bloomberg and Cointelegraph are considered low quality sources? Also you are saying I have too many sources, but a previous reviewer told ne I didn't have enough sources. So according to you I should choose max 3 sources? Thanks again. I will work on it until aporoved so it would be really appreciated if you could guide me to an approval for this article on which I already spent so much time and effort. Jstrob (talk) 17:04, 23 November 2024 (UTC)

@Jstrob Once a fact is cited then it is cited. More is overkill. More than three is Citekill

Excessive referencing is bombardment.

Redeploying the excess or keeping only the best is pragmatic. But reviewing before we know the sources you truly will be using is fruitless. Does that help? 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 18:16, 23 November 2024 (UTC)

Ok thanks I will go through all my sources and try to keep only the best. Jstrob (talk) 03:55, 25 November 2024 (UTC)

I went through all sources and tried to keep the best and most relevant. Can you tell me if it's now better please? Jstrob (talk) 04:51, 25 November 2024 (UTC)

@Jstrob Most assuredly more usefully referenced, though press releases are not helpful and investopedia is deprecated too. The great thing is twofold.

• you can work on it while it is submitted
• the next reviewer can see your reference choice clearly

Thank you for the hard work. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 08:47, 25 November 2024 (UTC)

Good morning Timrent, thank you so much for your help! Jstrob (talk) 13:49, 25 November 2024 (UTC)