User talk:Tinmanic

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome!

Hello, Tinmanic, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! --Neo-Jay (talk) 16:42, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

File:Samesex marriage in USA.svg[edit]

I don't think you're supposed to make such a radical change to the map without starting a discussion first and seeing if a new consensus can be reached. The current consensus is that the map will reflect laws that have been passed but are not yet in ef...

Tinmanic (talk)
I agree with you strongly, but could you please update Colorado to Constitutional Ban, striped with Marriage‐but‐in Name Civil Unions ? Colorado’s governor signed that in March and it took effect May first. I can’t edit the SVG code on the console I’m on now. Thank you for reverting the non‐consensus edit.
Info por favor (talk) 17:42, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

Consensus for Samesex marriage in USA.svɢ should SCOTUS decide H.v Perry on standing[edit]

I have made a proposal regarding the stripping of California, should the court reject Perry on the grounds that the plaintiffs had no standing to appeal, in which case, as I understand it, there could be much legal‐wrangling in California courts, and in the halls of Sacramento, over whether Judge Walker’s District Court ruling should apply statewide. I would much appreciate your comments on my proposal on the talkpage of Samesex_marriage_in_USA.svg. ― many thanks, Info por favor (talk) 19:07, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

File_talk:Samesex_marriage_in_USA.svg#Shade_of_blue_used_to_show_marriage[edit]

You previously took part in this discussion which resulted in no consensus to change the color blue. Last week User:Fry1989 unilaterally changed the color of the map without consensus. It appears now that this discussion is now reactivated and I invited to you return. Thegreyanomaly (talk) 18:36, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

Since you are fine with the proposed change, would you mind formally adding your support (or non-opposition, anyways) to the RfC? Fry1989 eh? 02:43, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

New Mexico[edit]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File_talk:Samesex_marriage_in_USA.svg#New_Mexico Prcc27 (talk) 03:23, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

Tinmanic, I would just like to thank you for the near instant update to the Same-Sex Marriage in the United States map, following today's court decision in Pennsylvania. I know that some other readers are also appreciative of the prompt changes that have been made.99.252.152.211 (talk) 01:45, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

Disruptive editing by Prcc27[edit]

@Knowledgekid87: left a notice on their talk page warning them about their disruptive editing with their new maps. Since you were involved in reverting their disruption as well, I thought to tell you so you may chime in if you wish. Thegreyanomaly (talk) 02:25, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

Just in case you missed this[edit]

You have new message/s Hello. You have a new message at User_talk:Joe_Decker#.22Accepted.22.3F's talk page.

Next time...[edit]

I'll use an old section to tell a joke. (Actually, you are right it shouldn't have been added at all) Anyway, thank you for the update.Naraht (talk) 18:18, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

No prob. Sorry if I was too harsh about it. Tinmanic (talk) 20:35, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

Virginia[edit]

Sorry, all I saw was "Virginia's ban is not yet in effect." Prcc27 (talk) 18:53, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

No worries. Tinmanic (talk) 18:54, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Some bubble tea for you![edit]

Bubble Tea.png For a good job in LGBT topic articles. M.Karelin (talk) 14:11, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

RfC inre SSM template[edit]

It looks like you also have to sign your certification, if I'm not mistaken... Thanks for doing this! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Difbobatl (talkcontribs) 20:34, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

Thanks. I think I've signed it properly now.Tinmanic (talk) 20:39, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for letting me know, I appreciate it. Tinmanic (talk) 15:58, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:16, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Territorial evolution of the United States[edit]

Tinmanic, please let us know your thoughts at Talk:Territorial evolution of the United States, comparing the last two versions: (1) the version with the map columns switched and (2) the present version with one column. Thanks. Jeff in CA (talk) 22:54, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Scale of justice 2.svg Hello, Tinmanic. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)