User talk:Tmmusgrove

February 2023

Hello, I'm LudicrousSengir. I noticed that you recently removed content from Alexandra Lúgaro without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Ludicrous (talk) 18:05, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I WILL CONTINUE TO EDIT THAT PAGE IT IS FALSE AND I WILL CONTINUE TO EDIT IT Tmmusgrove (talk) 18:21, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Alexandra Lúgaro, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you would like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. MaterialWorks _(talk) 18:18, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

NOPE I WILL CONTINUE TO CORRECT THAT PAGE Tmmusgrove (talk) 18:21, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Alexandra Lúgaro, you may be blocked from editing. MaterialWorks _(talk) 18:19, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

NO DISRUPTIVE EDITING HERE . ONLY TRUE CORRECTIONAL EDITS THANK YOU Tmmusgrove (talk) 18:22, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

recent edits

We noticed you're making contributions on an article about which you seem both knowledgeable and passionate. Thanks for helping! A friendly suggestion: approach your addition to the encyclopedia as though it were an important school assignment worthy of your precious time. Gather your sources, scribble a draft, let someone suggest edits, write it all down, tidy it all up, make sure it's sourced (make dam'd sure it's sourced) and the changes you're attempting will likely find a way into the article, given both factual and appropriately sourced.

Thanks again for building a truly unique encyclopedia, Saintstephen000 (talk) 18:17, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Recommend raising your concerns on the talk page

You clearly seem to be concerned about some of the content on Alexandra Lúgaro. Right now, you are blanking content in a way that violates policies and you will be blocked from editing if you continue. I would like to recommend that you raise your concerns on the article's talk page rather than continuously blank the article. That way, other editors can weigh in and we can achieve consensus. Others would be happy to hear your concerns. Thanks, Ludicrous (talk) 18:23, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

yes because some family members who dont know her personally are getting heat for it ...we arent racist and that information which i understand was the case in her legal issues , is false she was not the one that made those comments. i personally have been getting heat for it ,treated unfairly so i was trying to have it removed but sadly people now days love gossip and controversy . Tmmusgrove (talk) 17:29, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Alexandra Lúgaro have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Alexandra Lúgaro was changed by Tmmusgrove (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.940913 on 2023-03-02T11:53:34+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:53, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

You have been blocked from editing from certain pages (Alexandra Lúgaro) for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ... discospinster _talk 01:58, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]