User talk:Toospicy4u

October 2012

Hello, I'm SummerPhD. I noticed that you recently removed some content from 2 Chainz without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. SummerPhD (talk) 23:08, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

November 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Donald Glover was changed by Toospicy4u (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.961554 on 2012-11-04T20:21:39+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:21, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did here to Donald Glover, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 02:41, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

January 2013

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to ASAP Rocky, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 02:04, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did at Bradley Cooper, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Please read WP:FILMOGRAPHY for how to correctly format actor filmography tables. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 02:12, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Donald Glover, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Coachella (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:35, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

March 2013

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at ASAP Rocky, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 18:25, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Matt Bomer

Hi. Why did you remove this info from the Matt Bomer article? Nightscream (talk) 15:53, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. You removed content again from the Matt Bomer article with this edit, but without providing a rationale for this in an Edit Summary, and without responding to my message above. When removing material, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you ever have any other questions about editing, or need help regarding the site's policies, just let me know by leaving a message for me in a new section at the bottom of my talk page. Thanks. :-) Nightscream (talk) 22:22, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you delete apparently valid, sourced content from Wikipedia without providing a valid rationale in an edit summary as you did with this edit to Matt Bomer, and without discussing the matter with other editors who attempt to communicate with you, you will be blocked from editing. (Note, this also applies to similar edits, such as your removal of two citations with these edits to Stephen Amell.

In addition, please do not add material to articles without citing reliable sources for it, as you did with this edit to Arrow (TV series), as this is a violation of Wikipedia's policies on Verifiability.

Lastly, only the first word & proper nouns are capitalized in headings, as indicated by WP:SECTIONHEAD. Nightscream (talk) 02:27, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Regarding your recent edit to Matt Bomer, only the first word & proper nouns are capitalized in headings, as indicated by WP:SECTIONHEAD. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 05:30, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for various forms of disruptive editing and ignoring past warnings, including removing citations without rationale or edit summary, capitalization of secondary common nouns in headings, in violation of WP:SECTIONHEAD and use of IMDB, a website with user-generated content, in violation of WP:USERG, in these edits of Stephen Amell, and adding false Good Article tags to the Pitbull (entertainer), Donald Glover and Gunplay (rapper) articles. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Nightscream (talk) 01:39, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistent removal of citations from articles, and ignoring repeated warnings and a past block of this offense, the most recent recurrence of this behavior being this edit to Matt Bomer. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Nightscream (talk) 07:15, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Topher Grace

Hello, I'm Kevin12xd. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Topher Grace, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Kevin 12xd (contribs) 00:11, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]