User talk:Triple Twenty

Speedy deletion of Tic-tac-toe stratagy

A tag has been placed on Tic-tac-toe stratagy, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. HighKing (talk) 10:58, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, do you want the page you created deleted? If so then blank it completely and place {{db-author}} at the top. Thanks Monster Under Your Bed ^(talk) 11:09, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi :), I understood you probably wanted to delete Tic-tac-toe stratagy after you saw the speedy deletion notice at the top, which is fine. The reason why it is nominated for Speedy Deletion is because it is not helpful for Wikipedia. I just saw you tagged a few pages with the same speedy deletion notice. DON'T. Don't be angry at us, because we aren't at you. Guy0307 (talk) 11:18, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

August 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Please stop it. We can see it's you. Guy0307 (talk) 11:21, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, such as the edit you made to Opera. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. David Underdown (talk) 11:23, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as the one you made to Tenth Doctor. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. So Why 11:25, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

September 2008

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Yu-Gi-Oh! GX, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 17:06, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Masturbation

Thank you for your edits to Masturbation. I have removed them for now mainly because they don't fit the tone of the surrounding text. It is entirely possible that we can use the fact that you have supplied in that section, though, if we reword it a little. I encourage you to suggest on the talk page that this method be added. The Wednesday Island (talk) 13:55, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

October 2008

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to World Peace, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Guy0307 (talk) 10:12, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]