User talk:Truestorydad

Welcome!

Hello, Truestorydad, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! RFD (talk) 00:21, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Truestorydad (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not this person. I use meatball wiki i saw an alert and want check user done

Decline reason:

No reason to run a checkuser here. You clearly aren't a new user. Yamla (talk) 12:02, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Truestorydad (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I new user here. I use other wiki before. Please run check user

Decline reason:

Confirmed sockpuppetry. Mike V • Talk 21:21, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please use the {{help me}} template appropriately.
The {{help me}} template is for help in using Wikipedia, not for unrelated issues. If you would like to ask such a question, replace the code {{help me-inappropriate}} on this page with {{help me}} to reactivate the help request. Alternatively, you can also ask your question at the Teahouse, the help desk, or join Wikipedia's Live Help IRC channel to get real-time assistance.

I am requesting a public or private check user of group 2 and 3 of the confirmed check users to thegracefulslick. ThiS is for Mike_V Mike_V Truestorydad (talk) 23:41, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And if the group of CheckUsers confirms the findings you'll ask for another check by a larger group? Sorry, that's not how it works. Huon (talk) 23:52, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You've submitted two unblock appeals, that have been rejected by two separate admins, on the same day. One of them is a Checkuser admin. Also, you've violated the rule that forbids asking for checkuser in the unblock appeal.

The correct procedure is to seek ArbCom. See Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks#Checkuser and Oversight blocks. —Hexafluoride ^{Ping me if you need help, or post on my talk} 23:55, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I just saw I misread that. You're asking for yourself to be compared to TheGracefulSlick, someone your sock accused of sockpuppetry. You should know what other accounts you're abusing, and you should find it easy to provide evidence they are yours - if they are. No CheckUser needed. Huon (talk) 23:57, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am sure group 2 or 3 is thegracefulslick puppets Truestorydad (talk) 02:11, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Since group 3 is yourself, that is a claim that you are a TheGracefulSlick puppet. That makes things easy: Log into your User:TheGracefulSlick account and confirm from that account that User:Truestorydad is a TheGracefulSlick puppet, too. Is that impossible to you? Then we'll have to conclude you are lying to smear another editor. Huon (talk) 08:24, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]