User talk:USER19339393995

j

August 2021

Hello, I'm Equine-man. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Egg and Spoon have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Equine-man (talk) 18:10, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 18:25, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

USER19339393995 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am new to wikipedia. I would like to be shown the rules properly and I know how annoying previous edits from me were. Sorry.USER19339393995 (talk) 19:28, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Yeap, you've been deliberately abusive. No chance we'll be lifting this block, nor the block on your original account, not any time soon. You've worked hard to show you shouldn't be trusted. Yamla (talk) 19:38, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

USER19339393995 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

You seem a bit harsh on me. I feel i am not welcome on wikipedia because i made a mistake. i do not know how to edit properly and need to learn. when i improve i will make wikipedia a better place for everyone because i know how many people use this site.USER19339393995 (talk) 19:48, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You didn't make a single mistake, but conducted a pattern of inappropriate edits and compounded it by creating another account. Yep, no chance this is getting removed at this time. 331dot (talk) 19:56, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.